Thread:Theferretman21/@comment-31330278-20190725213756/@comment-30261954-20190726220213

1. Haven't played, I bought it recently but it won't work so I'm waiting on PS support to respond.

2.A. Yea, his character development works, the problem comes in that he isn't a strong enough character to work in the lead role. His character as a whole fits perfectly into the side character role with his personality. Imo, Grant makes for a more compelling and relate able main character.

B. While Tembo is The only good character in TLW, none of the supporting characters really hold up. Ludlow's only real character trait is greed, Sarah just comes off as a "Do as I say, not as I do" kind of character, etc. Also, there are plenty of things wrong with Amanda's character, bu, um, trying to stay alive causing a 14 year chain of events thst led to the creation of the Indominus is not one of them. That is the worst attempt at saying Amanda is a bad character I've ever heard.

Oh cool, the rest of this describes things that aren't done well in either movie besides the criticizing of media's "more teeth", which ironically is basically what FK does. And while I get your point, since wehn do we need a theme to make anything good? If executed correctly it can help a film, but you seem to suggest we need a thee to make films good at all. (I was done with this point when a friend I showed this post too made this: )

C. Jurassic World doesn't convey that at all, it conveys simply that the idea of hybrids s bad and always bad, while "normal" dinosaurs are treated as animals, therefore making them "good". There is never any reference on hybrids being capable of anything other than bad, they are given a bad predicament, but that is only brought up in one scene and it never really acts like not having that happen would make her a normal animal.

I've already been over the Spino a couple of times, every time we see it after the initial encounter it never acts like it was already hunting them, just that it bumped into them and attakced them from there. Birdcage? It's just staring at them like it just saw them. River. It's already established the Spinosaurus was upriver because of the dung and the direction it closed in on them. Is hunting/being territorial towards creatures you know can hurt you (plane wound) now unnatural? Are rhinos completely unrealistic now?

Um,the first film established that some raptors had learned to hunt cooperatively and not kill each other over food, making the raptors living in packs realistic within the franchises rules.

Laughs in Chris Pratt continues not acting

Yes, in 3 it was definitely only them, it's not like wanting to get your son off safe got in the way of getting of the island or something. Actually, this time I want you too come back, and back up your point on how they didn't realize the severity of the situation.

I'm sorry, let me bang my face against the wall then I'll be back. Alright, you're telling me it's not realistic that they weren't thinking of taking a side quest on their mission to save these people to kill an animal they had no idea existed? Especially since when they get back the testimonials are dismissed because the officials are bribed? They had no reason to go back to the island and hunt down something without permission that may not exist, they didn't even have permission the first time around.

D. That can effect the quality of the script, but in and of itself it doesn't mean anything on how this film is rated.

3.I would say agree but one question, why put this at the end? You can't just give your points then ask for us not to do this conversation again, especially if this conversation was long dead until you brought it back up.