Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-10906513-20150613143615/@comment-27687223-20160216160130

RaptorGod02 wrote: Votesmall wrote: The Spino actually has arms that it can use, and it's larger and more agile.

The T-Rex's only actual advantage was a hard bite. That's it. The Spinosaurus had every advantage in that fight. To the Spino statement: In real life, a Spinosaurus would have been a true klutz on land, especially in a forest of all places. While it did live in a mangrove swamp-ish area, that had large amounts of water.

To the Rex statement: T. rex may have weighed less, but its bite would definitely have absolutely SHATTERED the neck vertebrae of the Spino in JPIII if it were true to fact. Remember- Bite force of up to 57,000 newtons is more than enough to break bone. Also, we see Rexy using multiple strategies against the Indominus rex, like headbutting (seen in the Rex vs. Spino fight) and going for the neck very quickly (also seen in JP3).

To the Spino having every advantage comment: Spino would have been dead once the Tyrannosaurus got a good bite on the neck (or even the sail or skll for that matter), Spino could not fight effectively in that tight of a space, and the entire fight is just one very inaccurate part of a very inaccurate movie. (Not to be a jerk to Spielberg, but the movie does get a LOT wrong) Laura Sorkin  noted in her  journal  that the  Velociraptors  are three times as large as they should be. Sorkin blames this on the use of  frog DNA. She writes (keep in mind,  Achillobator' s bones had been discovered and labeled as a species of  Velociraptor, but not given its own name)