Thread:Dinosaurus1/@comment-6025261-20180506225538/@comment-6025261-20180506231325

Dinosaurus1 wrote: First of all, Dracorex did have two holes in its fenestrae. Second of all, its skull showed ossification, or hardening of the bone. All of this is important info. Removing Dracorex’s extra info is like removing the fact that T. Rex had a bone crushing jaw. Are you not listening to me? It doesn't have to as extensive information as T. rex. Also, it is not at all as important as T. rex having a strong bite. Also, the way you wrote it, Dracorex has to be its' own genus which is a similar "problem" you gave to me by saying that  "it will provide only info that seems to suggest that Dracorex is indefinitely a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus" except it actually is a problem. The way it is now is the best middleground I can think of. Please don't change it again.