Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-1187034-20160321053407/@comment-1259419-20160321151504

MarkJira wrote:

But at the same time, 1928 can't be right, because Hammond was most definitely older than 65 in the first movie.

Richard Attenborough, the actor who played John Hammond, was born in 1923. Which is only 5 years (marginally) older than 1928. So, people just don't age well.

Furthermore, it wouldn't have been the first time that an actor looks much older/younger than the character he/she portrayes.