Board Thread:Fossil Fuels/@comment-1259419-20151022211430/@comment-25238001-20151127193101

BastionMonk wrote: Jurassic Park IS supposed to be a scientifically accurate franchise. Jurassic Park is intended as hard science fiction, like Gravity and Interstellar. Michael Crichton's books are soo popular because of the hard science behind his novel's themes. Sure they have made mistakes, but dito for documentary series like Walking With Dinosaurs.

If Jurassic Park was just pulp fiction with dinosaurs in it, I would never bother managing a wiki about it. The JP movies are scientifically accurate for 1993. In the modern day, much of the series' science doesn't hold up, but in order to maintain cntinuity, the science remains unchanged.