User blog comment:BastionMonk/No feathers in JPIV/@comment-93.40.182.33-20130916183154

IN MY OPINION, being featherless is not that bad. Imagine if one day a palaeontologist will discover that those 2feathers" were actually something else. Documentarists would be very angry because they would have to remake all their documentaries without adding feathers to dinosaurs.

Some palaeontologists believe that those structures wereactualli proto feathers rather than real feathers (they call it dino fuzz), so it's better to not risk. Otherwise creationists would laugh at scientists and then they would say evolution is wrong and then they would claim that creation is right without demonstrating this latter sentence, since they think it's sufficient to deny a theory to confirm their myth (in Italy we say "se non è zuppa è pan[e] bagnato, wich means if it's not soupe it's wet bread, wich means that if there are two possibilities and one is proven wrong, then the other one is certainly right), and I really don't believe in that myth.

They cand add them as well as they cannot. it's their choice and I will watch that film anyway. The important thing is to NOT do like in some documentaries where they added chicken - like wattles 'cause they could not be taken seriously. That's my opinion. I respect yours.