Board Thread:Jurassic Park News/@comment-166.137.248.31-20170823195846/@comment-166.137.248.31-20170824184824

CrashBash wrote: 166.137.248.31 wrote: Let's settle something. Bayona's said that the film is about animal and dinosaur cruelty, right? The 9 creatures (including the Indoraptor) will have roles. The rest will either be short-screen animatronics or CGI (I hope Blue isn't CGI). Believe me, I know what I saw, and I am not lying. Universal doesn't want you to know anything. Besides, my list includes all 10 confirmed dinosaurs, but maybe they have more dinos to confirm, like Parasaurolophus, Spinosaurus, etc. who knows?

No, the list is fake, or it never existed in the first place. You can keep saying "I know what I saw" or "I am not lying" as many times as you want, but EVERY single person who has posted a so-called "rumour" that turns out to be fake has invariably said the exact same thing, so I absolutely cannot take your word for it.

The simple reason being, you have no proof of your so-called "discovery". I do. If you want me to believe you, then find another source. If this is truly as big as you claim it is, it must be somewhere else.

Your list is much too big for the film, and much too random. The one I've provided is FAR more likely to be the real deal.

The list is only 40-41 creatures long: 16 carnivores, 15 herbivores, 3 pterosaurs, 3 aquatic creatures, 1 non-dinosaur (which is a giant crocodilian) and 2-3 hybrids. That is the number that people wanted in the past, right? Imagine a list of over 50 dinosaurs. That amount is just enough to prove that that list is fake. Bayona's film might be likely to include LESS than 50 creatures ( like my discovery), to avoid the film from being too great and random. I did read your 'you can say that it is real all you want', so I will have to find only one option to make you believe me by the slightest idea: wait until the film comes out. When it does, we will see if either one is right, but for now, this thread is just a prediction.