Thread:Mjamnnella/@comment-4655954-20151124232807/@comment-2253059-20160103194621

I know you asked me not to post here, but you also asked BadlyBruisedMuse to admit he was also wrong. He did not. He was also allowed to post on my own message wall without any repercussions, even after I told you nothing good would come out of any direct contact between us.

Remember, I wrote on your message wall because you were given a negative impression of me and I wanted to demonstrate there was wrongdoing on all sides. BadlyBruisedMuse chose to respond with this post, where he continues to push his belief that he’s an innocent little do-gooder who’s done nothing wrong. So long as these posts about me remain up, I’m going to contest the allegations made against me.

First of all, the correct term for what I did is “doxing.” BadlyBruisedMuse is only claiming I “cyberstalked” him because FishTank implanted that idea in his mind. Look up doxing and you’ll see that’s exactly what I did; I researched his personal information. I understand why you would be aghast at this, but it’s not illegal. Anything you post publically online can be seen by anyone. If you don’t want people discovering personal things about you, don’t make them public.

Above all else, let’s not forget why I did a background check on him. I didn’t do it just because of a disagreement. I did it because BadlyBruisedMuse is a condescending, disrespectful, and all-around mean-spirited bully who was trying to force me to accept his edits, even after I proved mine were superior and he resorted to the old “I’m right because I say so!” style of arguing. I did because the admins weren’t doing anything, even after he violated an order to stop attacking others over a difference of opinion.

There is no evidence to prove BadlyBruisedMuse’s mother was distressed by my message. Right now, there’s no evidence to prove what really happened that day. However, BadlyBruisedMuse’s actions after his mother was contacted imply his description of what happened isn’t accurate:

1. He posted on my message wall, at first mocking me for what I did. A few minutes later, he then edited the message to tell me contacting his mother “won’t work” and then quickly removed it. 2. He made a Facebook status saying he felt “very betrayed.”

BadlyBruisedMuse claims he posted that message because he was initially amused until he realized how apparently upset she was, although that doesn’t explain why he edited and then removed the message. But what’s more telling is his status. Why would he feel betrayed?

The most probable answer is this: His mother didn’t take his side. She didn’t buy into his excuses. She thought what he did was wrong and like always, he refused to admit it. If she was distressed, it’s more likely she was distressed by his online activity and his inability to acknowledge his wrongdoing. That’s on him.

And I know - this is cyberstalking, right? Again, anything posted publically can be seen by the public. Plus, this is relevant information that refutes BadlyBruisedMuse’s claim of what happened, which is only supported by his word.

While I still acknowledge what I did was petty, it wasn’t done to get to him. It was done so he could be disciplined. I was desperate and I didn’t know who else to turn to.

Like I said before, BadlyBruisedMuse’s Twitter is literally on his Wikia profile. If he doesn’t want Wikia users visiting his Twitter, he shouldn’t be providing them with a direct link to it. The information he is referring to is a tweet where he talked about slitting his dad’s throat. That’s the kind of post that could get you into legal trouble. Again, that’s on him. He created that ugly image himself.

The Wikia Staff, like a jury, are human. They are not impartial and they’re more likely to trust the word of someone who’s a Wikia Star (and now a member of the staff). They’re especially going to be supportive of wiki admins, who are typically ideal and accomplished users. After all, I didn’t get banned for “harassing American Horror Story Wiki users on other sites.” I was banned for “harassing American Horror Story Wiki admins on other sites.” Also note the “other sites” part, which blows a hole in his claim that the avatar issue was a factor in why I was banned. Before and after this post was made, I never denied what I did.

Throughout this entire post, BadlyBruisedMuse acts like this was all over a disagreement. Again, it was because of his conduct. It was because he couldn’t admit he was wrong, he tried to make me believe I was wrong, he made a post insulting me on his own message wall, and the admins did nothing, even after he was warned. And I’m the only one with the problem, even though he’s the one who felt the need to write an almost 500-word victim-playing response to a post that wasn’t even directed at him. A post he normally wouldn’t have been notified about because it wasn’t on his wall. Not to mention his post was made after over a month of inactivity on this wiki. So how did he find my post? Could he be…“stalking” my edits?

Regardless, BadlyBruisedMuse can keep talking about all the things he didn’t do, but that doesn’t change the things he did do, nor does it make them acceptable.

Also, to address his comments here:

BadlyBruisedMuse claims he didn’t exaggerate anything, but as I pointed out before, he previously said I contacted multiple friends and family members of his. He is still unable to establish who else I contacted besides the two he talked about here.

The fact that the report made against me was filled by a Wikia Star, somebody the staff would trust, and has since been promoted to staff, also speaks volumes.

For a guy who’s supposed to be honest, FishTank is admitting he reported me after I met his demands and backed down.

And I’m the one who’s apparently dishonest.