Thread:Animalman57/@comment-33613830-20171222210230/@comment-2118191-20171224163444

Mingaba wrote: CrashBash wrote: Because it's better than those 50-dino lists that nobody would shut up about, and it's something at least semi-believable. But that still does not prove it is true. It could still be fake, for all we know.

I know, but it's "less fake" than the aforementioned lists that had 50 dinosaurs. Thus it's more believable. I would be happier to humour that than I would the lists.