Thread:Animalman57/@comment-1734776-20180910043018

You say you removed the juvenile T. rex information because it contradicts what the Jurassic World website says for the original paddock, but what sense does it make to reject new information from a valid source? The DPG overrides older information, otherwise we'd still be claiming 100% that Isla Sorna is still full of dinosaurs with no doubt about it, among other things. The JW website passage doesn't say there were two Tyrannosaurs, only that the paddock was built for two. The DPG information clarifies that despite the ability to hold two, there was only ever one. I do not see the problem with this.

And could please explain why you refuse to have a page for the Bull T. rex, but there is one for the infant from The Lost World? I'm not trying to argue. I'm just genuinely curious why an animal that didn't actively do anything has a page, while an animal that's part of one of the most infamous scenes in franchise history doesn't. That's all, sir. 