Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-2145732-20150619235213/@comment-27389023-20161111160343

73.130.190.116 wrote: 1. I am new here and i did not know about the edit button in the first place.

2. It is rather sad that you rely on my grammar/spelling mistakes to support your statements against me.

3. The only large theropods on Skull island are the  Vastaosaurus-Rex and Venatosaurus Saevidicus.

4. You can't just tell someone they lost a debate/argument and end there without expecting a response.

5. I ranted on the entire movie scene meaning i think (know actually) that anything with the similar jaw strength of a T-rex would have destroyed Kong in a realistic scenario. (Kong has got bitten a multitude of times by the V-rexes and should have lost his arms from it. You wouldn't beleive that a Shrew could kill a Python if you saw it in a CGI based movie now would you?

6. The I-rex doesn't need "experience" because it was specifically designed to kill.

Any questions children? Firstly Kongs species likely evolved to withstand large bite forces from large theropods because they have been living together for hundreds of thousands of years but not evolved to resists tones of spitfire through the back.

Second you keep going on about how realistic a movie is that is clearly designed to be unreastic. Theres is no such things as a 50ft ape or gentically engineered Dinosaurs that can talk to other Dinosaurs for that matter.

Thirdly all predators are "designed" to kill naturally by nature but they still need to learn and gain experience. If a lion just popped into existence without any experience it wouldnt surive one second like the I rex which escaped and died within a few hours.