Thread:Dinosaurus1/@comment-6025261-20180506225538/@comment-6025261-20180506230343

Dinosaurus1 wrote: I disagree. The info which was provided does give at least some insight into whether Dracorex is its own genus, while at the same time, stirring the debate that it is a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus. When you delete the info, it will provide only info that seems to suggest that Dracorex is indefinitely a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus. Also, we need details for Dracorex, like we have details for T. Rex. Thus, leave the page alone, please? The sentence below most of the paragraph clearly says, though, that it's not confirmed to be a juvenile Pachy. Also, the word dubious at the beginning of both Dracorex and Stygimoloch would help with that since dubious means hesitating or doubting. We don't need all that info in a short overview of what this dinosaur is.