Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-25238001-20160127220854/@comment-25238001-20160127231952

Mjamnnella wrote:

MarkJira wrote: Now that one is ENTIRELY on Hammond. And Nedry wasn;t really a bad employee. In fact, he was remarkably skilled. He just had an agenda separate from Hammond's

Good business practices are always a good idea. Perhaps I should've been a bit clearer... By "best", I not only meant skilled and talented, but also devoted. One that will dedicate their life to the park and capable of handling any situation (perhaps there could be a physical test as part for the hiring), so there won't be any bad influences while they're working at the park. Fair enough.

Anyway, my point is, safety won't really be an issue if common sense is practiced, so I go with the park that can sustain public interest for as long as it can.