Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-174.31.243.252-20150708155943/@comment-25238001-20160123000808

QuakingStar wrote: If by chance the Tyrannosaurus was a sub-adult, then that would mean that the Spinosaurus was a sub-adult too, if you're going to go by assumption then we can't pick and choose. As we know InGen Tyrannosaurs are supposed to get up to 20ft tall and 45 feet long at maximum and Spinosaurs from InGen are supposed to get up to 22ft tall and 50 feet long at maximum. So either they were both sub-adults(which now that I think about it they both may have been sub-adults considering the Spinosaur wasn't generally sticking near the river banks like most adults should be.. and the Tyrannosaur wasn't in the other half of Sorna sticking in the same region as with the other Tyrannosaurs) So either they were both adults, or they were both sub-adults..... what do you guys think?? Collector1? Mjamnella? MarkJira? There;s a little bit of stock to that theory, which is the stuff that you brought up. I always figured that the T.rex was sub-adult, so that's part of my personal canon. But, as you say, we can't pick and choose. The Spinosaurus was six or seven feet below it's maximum length, so I'd say it was probably nearing adulthood. I still think the Spinosaur was at least more mature than the T.rex, and this sort of supports that...