Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-174.31.243.252-20150708155943/@comment-26923065-20160122235443

QuakingStar wrote: If by chance the Tyrannosaurus was a sub-adult, then that would mean that the Spinosaurus was a sub-adult too, if you're going to go by assumption then we can't pick and choose. As we know InGen Tyrannosaurs are supposed to get up to 20ft tall and 45 feet long at maximum and Spinosaurs from InGen are supposed to get up to 22ft tall and 50 feet long at maximum. So either they were both sub-adults(which now that I think about it they both may have been sub-adults considering the Spinosaur wasn't generally sticking near the river banks like most adults should be.. and the Tyrannosaur wasn't in the other half of Sorna sticking in the same region as with the other Tyrannosaurs) So either they were both adults, or they were both sub-adults..... what do you guys think?? Collector1? Mjamnella? MarkJira? I've heard that idea some time ago, but never found interest in it. That's a very good suspicion you found. Perhaps if enough admins agree on it, then it can be added to the trivia section as a theory (similar to the theory about the survival of Echo on her article).