Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-166.137.248.31-20170831135037/@comment-2602:306:32D4:8130:10FB:A8FF:95F7:ACA-20170906235235

Teen Titans Forever! wrote: I agree with you CrashBash that without dinosaurs it's a spinoff but what if a "Cenozoic Park" film still had dinosaurs but in a secondary role? Is it still a spinoff? I personally think so but I want to know your thoughts on it. No. I don't think that it's a spinoff. It could still be the main film in the real timeline of the Jurassic Park. However, that kind of stuff would be saved for the 2 sequels after "Cenozoic Park". But of course, a JP film like this one without even a mention or cameo of the dinosaurs would be a spinoff, so that is why there is a small cameo of the T-Rex and co. to save their streak appearance in films, while maintaining the Cenozoic creatures as their Primary focus at the same time. This is easily disagreeable with you guys, CrashBash and TTF, but I am fine with it. Everyone has their opinions.