Thread:MarkJira/@comment-28675190-20161105134107/@comment-25238001-20161105231655

Logo8th wrote: While it is still an interesting and amazing theory, I've found three plot holes that haven't been accounted for yet. The first is that Oxalia is only known from a small piece of the snout and of the body. All full body drawings are inacurate as of now, as we don't know what it truly looked like. Thus, we don't know if it looked like JP's Spinosaurus or not. Second, this movie was made in 2001. The Spinosaurus in the movie was how Spinosaurus was believed to have looked like in 2001. And finnaly, the DNA of the Spinosaurus, as with most of the dinosaurs in JP before JW, is incomplete. Some gaps were filled in with other DNA, meaning that JP's Spinosaurus might not have looked like a real one if they had tampered with its gentic code. Well, yes, the creature portrayed in JPIII does look like how Spino was thought to look in 2001, but we now know it looks much different. There should be an in-universe explanation for that, and this is my theory as to what that explanation is.