Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-1259419-20150330075200/@comment-6493791-20150405044100

Ibarber wrote: I see it both ways, but as I a fan I take consideration a few of the novels events being in the movie and plus an ecology can recover the way I mentioned in reality it is just common sense

First off, you can't just assume certain events from the novel happen in the movie canon simply because you like them or they seem convenient. There's too many differences. If you personally think that way about certain events, that's fine. But that is not how this wiki applies information, that's more or less fan speculation. If an event happens in the novel, that has no effect on what happens in the film universe. Filmmakers might base events in the film on an event in the novels, but they have to maintain a seperate continuity, Michael Crichton was very aware of that.

Second, an ecology cannot fully recover in 20 years. That's common sense, a Cycad (pretty generic fern-like tree) takes a very long time to germinate and even longer to begin growing, several decades before full maturity. Also, many ecological restoration projects have taken over 50 years to show promising results. We see in every shot of Jurassic World's trailers, the island is complete flora. Many locations look exactly as they did in the first film (Gallimimus valley, the lagoon, etc.) These are all facts that support the bombing being aborted. The majority of your claims are purely opinion and speculation.