Thread:Animalman57/@comment-33613830-20171222210230/@comment-2118191-20171224190331

Mingaba wrote: Don't forget Kritosaurus, it was confirmed alongside Giganotosaurus.

Also, that 'leak' only has 17 dinos, portrays the Indoraptor wrong (it almost looked like a Pachycephalosaurus to me), and has done a ton of other things wrong.

And to CrashBash: Maybe you should tell him what he meant. Just saying.

All of these "proofs" have already been countered, though. The Kritosaurus is no more reliable than Giganotosaurus (the translation doesn't even say "Kritosaurus", so assuming it is is speculation), and it's already been established that the Indoraptor looks more or less like that anyway...the "it looks like a Pachycephalosaurus, therefore it's fake" argument has been countered already. And what else has it done wrong? That haven't already been countered. You say ton of other things wrong, but don't explain them.

And no, I won't, because people won't stop pestering me about it.