Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-95.91.175.60-20151027170948/@comment-25727858-20151028194451

95.91.175.60 wrote: I can't stop chuckling, the more I think about it; and it seems noone else notices this (really?):

Why in the world is the "Indominus Rex" called "indominus"? - who would want to name this aggressive carnivore like that?!?

This [laughable] mistake seems very strange, since in times of the internet, any piece of information, any double-check only seems one click away? - they could have figured this out incredibly easily!

I guess it'S rather obvious that they meant to name him (the king) as "unruly" or something like that - but instead his name translates to "un-lordly", "un-authoritative", "un-bossy" or "un-tyrannical"; certainly not what the writers were going for, right?

If they wanted to give it a name that implies it being "unruly", or "uncontrollable", the words "indomiTus" and/or "indomabilis" would have been the way to go... unless they meant to imply that "Indominus Rex" was a gentle giant xD  (wolf in sheeps glothing?)

stupid writers are stupid. Funny shit! ... But it certainly does hurt the athmosphere of the movie to notice this embarrassing fauxpas! Were you drunk when you decided to post this?