Thread:UltraMegaDude/@comment-1633483-20171218203255/@comment-1633483-20171218214140

There would have been no reason to create a blog outlining a major edit to the wiki if I didn't intend to make a major edit to the wiki. Not only that, I clearly outlined the structure of my edit of the T. rex page in the blog, which you agreed with at the time.

Furthermore, while it may be the case that you aren't adaptable to major edits—which is technically irrelevant, as this is a constructive contribution on my part—that's precisely the reason why I created a blog, and added a comment linking to the  planned rewrite, and left a finished version on the wiki for four days for anybody to object to it. Given that people had the opportunity to object, and didn't, the edit shouldn't have been removed based on your whim, when it was made in accordance with wiki policy on major edits.

Additionally, as you can see by comparing both of the edits, I didn't completely rewrite the page. In fact, a large portion of the information was copy and pasted from the older revision, albeit given more structure. As for information about the real animal, that hardly justisfied a full revert. You'll notice that biological facts about the real animal have a section of their own, so as to distinguish between fiction and science. As wikis are a collaborative endeavour, however, such information could be easily re-added to the updated version of the page.