Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-2602:306:32D4:8130:C427:1877:D953:DADE-20170923133435/@comment-2602:306:32D4:8130:4400:1BDC:1B4:631B-20170924204258

CrashBash wrote: You are literally creating a Mary-Sue dinosaur. Nobody is going to like that. Guaranteed.

And, no, the wings can't be placed on the back because that's not where pterosaur wings go. They go on the arms, because they ARE the arms.

Your idea just doesn't work, is horrendously flawed, and your attempts at making it "perfect" are making it unlikable and impossible. I'd seriously recommend you start afresh. And get rid of the name "Dinosaurus" because it simply doesn't work. Oh, so dragons (not counting wyverns) MUST have wings on their arms? So what, a few slight changes in the DNA code, and the wings can be on the back. Pterosaurs have wings for arms because they are like that way. Heck, let's consider Jeholopterus, a pterosaur that has had wings on its LEGS.

People won't like Dinosaurus because it can kill a T-Rex, and, of course, no one likes that. You know what is a Mary-Sue Dinosaur? Indominus Rex and Ultimasaurus. They are very close to being Mary-Sues with their abilities. Heck if I were to present Indominus Rex while the I-Rex never happened, you would say the same thing.

Also, has there ever been the term "Dinosaurus" itself? Look it up, and you will find it as a title of a movie from 2002. That is stupid indeed, cuz there were no dinosaur named Dinosaurus. Maybe if they were to dig up a huge theropod larger than Spinosaurus, they should name it Dinosaurus.

Last thing: Dinosaurus is based off of Ultimasaurus, it's not unique, it's just inspired. Of course, this thing will get the chance to appear in like the 15th Jurassic Park film or something.

Of course, this idea is weird and cheesy, but what if it could work?