Board Thread:Video Games/@comment-99.45.72.19-20170523210743/@comment-2118191-20170526162801

Technically, my comment was after Thkarides', not yours, but lets not split hairs over that. I assure you, it was aimed at the IP user, since I mentioned pitting sea and land creatures, which your comment did not. The IP user's set up does feature sea and land creatures in the same park which, really, would not work in the Arena section...plus also it'd mean not including rather iconic Paleozoic creatures. Can you imagine a Jurassic Park without Tyrannosaurus? Pretty sure a Paleozoic Park without Dimetrodon would be the same. But, yeah, this isn't the first time you've misinterpreted a comment I've written, I do think you need to read over things a little more carefully. Just a little friendly advice.

Unfortunately, and this IS referring to your post, moving animals from one park to another simply wouldn't work. The entire game would need to be completely revamped for one thing, including the whole Arena and that would either take too long, cost too much or simply be impractical. Also, I can't imagine too many people who already have firmly established parks would be very happy if they showed up one day and found that about 1/4 of their animals, which they've spent a lot of time raising, had gone. You can say "they're moved to another park", but the fact of the matter is, to them, they're "gone".

I honestly think that a Paleozoic Park would be a cool idea, don't get me wrong, but I don't think it can realistically be included in Jurassic World: The Game. A sequel, certainly possible, but not here.