Thread:JurassicMisfits/@comment-2118191-20180304170642/@comment-34832962-20180304191227

CrashBash wrote: JurassicMisfits wrote: And who pray tell are you?

Listen I am just trying to help the wiki out and be a team player. I do not take kindly accusations and as I told Dinosaurus1, IF he is willing enough to calm down, to form a compromise and vote on the matter. We can even ask the opinions of Paleontologists and see what they can inform us about these aforementioned dinosaurs and help identity them before any "official" confirms from Colin Treverrow.

There is no need for this animosity and I didn't myself as being rude like that ibarber fellow. I was just being my casual self. Only the moderator of this forum who has the right to ban any users behaving in an unsavory fashion.

We are not having a vote on the matter. The fact of the matter is, the skeleton of the ankylosaur in JW:FK does not have a confirmed identity. It is an ankylosaur, that is all we know. You have no proof that it is Hoplitosaurus. Discussing the matter with paleontologists will achieve nothing because they did not work on the film, so they won't know. The fact of the matter is, only the film's producers will be able to confirm the dinosaur, and since they haven't, it cannot be said to be Hoplitosaurus. To say it is is speculation, plain and simple.

If you have evidence...producer confirmation...that it is Hoplitosaurus, then post it. But do not just post massive scientific essays because that is not proof. Do you or do you not understand? So be it. That's on you...so the end is in sight I'll be taking my leave with dino knowledge and sense of reason I have left since this going no where. But I will say you really ought to apologize to Ibarber.

Farewell...