Thread:Animalman57/@comment-33613830-20171222210230/@comment-33613830-20171222232802

In my opinion, its just Jurassic Park mutating Pachyrhinosaurus to make it have the frill of Sinoceratops and a nose horn. Just my opinion.

BUT... if there is literally already an animatronic of Pachyrhinosaurus featured in Jurassic World: The Exhibition, then that animatronic would be used for this movie. Thus meaning that the ceratopsid that was running on land, which is the same as the leak, really isn't Pachyrhinosaurus; it's another ceratopsid, is it?

Oh yeah, and that 'leak' could be proven fake because of two things...

1. Stygimoloch looks more like a Xenomorph in the leak, if you look closely. Its head looks so curved, especially with the horns and the dome. It looks like this in JW:FK.

2. Compsognathus looks more dromaeosaurid in the leak, while in the movie, it looks natural just as it is.

3. Blue looks like she has a nasal horn, almost like Proceratosaurus in the leak. She has NO crest like that in the film.

4. Indoraptor looks NOTHING like how it's portrayed in the film. Nothing. In fact, Peenut, it DOES look Pachycephalosaurian, with a beak, a flat skull with a little-pronounced dome, and spikes coming out on the back of the head.

5. Allosaurus looks more like Carnotaurus, at least with those horns.

So 6 points, counting the Pachyrhinosaurus's animatronic being in Jurassic World Exhibition and its different appearance in real life, could prove that this 'leak' is fake.