Board Thread:Jurassic Park News/@comment-45.73.154.146-20171026180511/@comment-27724978-20171027210557

A note on the Concavenator - the fact that it doesn’t 100% look like a Concavenator does not debunk that possibility, because this is Jurassic park and all the dinosaurs look like shit. Additionally, if you google Concavenator you can find many an image with the duo sail configuration in the image. Meanwhile, the Ichthyovenator’s sail notch? Fossil damage I’m afraid, the animal probably didn’t have it in life.

'''As for maintainance of continuity, have you not seen Jurassic World? They care little for any of the original designs, looking like a child’s drawing of a JP dinosaur. Likewise, the filmmakers do not care for the novels, websites, leaflets and other such things you use to suggest that animals like Baryonyx are totally in this one you guys! Brachiosaurus? Gallimimus? Mamenchisaurus? Corythosaurus? Spinosaurus? Ceratosaurus? Pteranodon? Dimorphodon? Completely non-existent in the novels. Even Compsognathus pisses on the Procompsognathus of the novels, waving its erroneous species name behind it. Remember all those novel dinosaurs and leaflet dinosaurs that were going to be in Jurassic World? Remember how many of them were actually IN Jurassic World? 1. Apatosaurus''' 1. The dinosaurs in JP look awesome so watch yourself.

2. The continuity in JW is just fine. They do care but they also know the general audinece is what makes them more money.