User blog comment:Dinosaurus1/Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom V.S. Star Wars: The Last Jedi/@comment-31757904-20190228221151/@comment-4864110-20190302025322

For me. As far as I'm concerned, the Star Wars sequel trilogy is not canon to me because Disney and LucasFilms removed the original EU and made their own universe, which took away a lot of characters that I loved and some of the great stuff on it, despite some issues with that universe. The only thing canon in my head is the original trilogy and the prequel trilogy. (This is potentially to be spoiler, so excuse me for posting this) The sequel trilogy is nothing, but a bunch of political nonsense with no storyline and the new characters on it are poorly developed. There's nothing original about that trilogy. Kylo Ren is nothing, but a Darth Vader wannabe. They borrowed material already used in the original EU and claimed it was their own issue, which is so untrue. Some actors in those movies (Max Von Sydow, Benicho Del Toro and such) are wasted. Luke in The Last Jedi was poorly developed and is nothing more than a hermit who gave up everything, compared to the original Luke in the original who is a true Jedi master and the leader who never gives up despite all that he lost.. In The Last Jedi, it should have been Ackbar making that kamikaze attack instead of that stupid, purple haired woman (don't care about her name). I think the spinoff films (Rogue One and Solo) are slightly better than the sequel trilogy, despite using things already used in the original EU. Disney's Star Wars universe is pathetic, derivative and convoluted. That's how I see in those movies.

That's why the Jurassic World movies are better than the current Star Wars films because it has some better original characters compared to the sequel trilogy, some better storylines, some creativity while it does have some things used in the first three films, among other things.