Board Thread:Jurassic Park News/@comment-166.137.248.31-20170823195846/@comment-166.137.248.31-20170824163137

CrashBash wrote: 166.137.248.31 wrote: UndeadGaming606 wrote: this totally sounds like bullsh*t (are we allowed to swear on this wiki?)

that is

way too many dinosaurs

to fit in one movie

without it being a clusterf*ck

I got the dinos from a YouTube tease from a commentator on one of FyrTV's JW:FK videos. It got taken down a few days later. I am only able to recall the new dinos as well as the originals, but I don't remember everything. We have a couple (if not a few) hybrids coming so just be grateful for that. I hope all these dinos appear, according to that one-in-a-lifetime tease.

The fact you specifically mentioned that it was taken down a few days later, thus you have no way to prove it, suggests one of three things.


 * 1) It was fake from the very start
 * 2) No one ever actually made that list
 * 3) You made that list up yourself

With all due respect, I am absolutely positive that the list you've provided is 100% false. There are just way too many dinosaurs to fit into a movie that's probably going to be between an hour/hour-and-a-half. It's simply impractical. Meanwhile, the leak I found has only nine, which is much more manageable...PLUS, there's actually a link.

Hey don't be that harsh. It's not fake, I really saw it. Besides, none of us knows what dinos will appear from the film. Heck, I'm not even sure about it. I only saw a leak on that YouTube tease. This list not made up, even if the original list got taken down and not there anymore. Here's my theory: the leak that got taken down from YouTube actually proves my point. I'm not sure, but if it was still there, it is a fake. I never took any pictures, anyways, because I didn't want to spoil myself. You were never there to see what I saw.