User blog comment:Daniel large/The Lost World Jurassic park Vs. Jurassic park 3/@comment-206.218.52.33-20150709031530

The Lost World is far worse than Jurassic Park Three. While Jurassic Park 3's plot was lazier, The Lost World had this really dumb, ham-fisted message about how "bad" and "evil" mankind is. Especially when it shows the humans capturing the pseudo-dinosaurs and it shows the main characters look disgusted (or whatever they were trying to convey). Here's the problem with all of that, none of those pseudo-dinosaurs were majestic and magical creatures, they were genetically engineered monsters that should have been wiped out in the first place. Also the cliché about how "evil" mankind can be, is one of the dumbest, hypocritical, trite, and sanctimonious themes people can force into a film. We're not evil, we're not good, we're simply the dominate species, sucks for every other species but that's the way the cookie crumbles. So shame on Jurassic Park Three for being lazy. Even more shame on The Lost World for being not only pretentious, but lazy for not even having the decency to explain why we're so "evil" as a species. Maybe if they actually made an argument as to why mankind is so "evil" without having to resort to something as lazy as pathos, they might have a point. To absolutely no one's surprise, they don't really have any quantifiable or measurable reasons why humanity is "evil". Also that crap theme tends to fall apart considering humanity was screwing with something that's not really natural in the first place (the pseudo-dinosaurs).