Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-1259419-20150612225652/@comment-15441914-20160612175942

108.61.228.78 wrote: I believe that, though the I. Rex was fully grown they may have intended to take quite some time building its new enclosure, months, in fact. While the website may have had odd dates, going directly off of the film (which wasn't created by fans) she very well could have meant they intended the enclosure to be completed by May of 2016, perhaps? They still needed to learn a lot about this creature they'd created before they could create the proper safeguards. They were having all kinds of trouble with it, I doubt they intended it to be ready in a month without an actual viewing area built yet. The place the I. Rex was at, by the way, was definitely not designed for proper viewing by park goers, it was instead designed as a place to raise it until it was ready to go on display, then they would move the attraction and use that space to raise another I. Rex or similar species with similar habitat requirements. That's exactly how zoos handle their attractions, minus putting the babies on display (since everyone loves zoo babies). I'd imagine since they wanted "scary" they wouldn't want to go "cute" with the babies on display right away, they'd wait for the fully-grown "monsters". I agree!

But hey, if incident at Jurassic World happened in december 2016, is it possible indominus hatched take place of Jurassic World release date (june 12 2015)?

Sorry with bad english, again (i'm finnish)