Thread:Ibarber/@comment-25075536-20150520231341/@comment-1187034-20150524012742

I'm not saying that animals lack a conscious or even morals, what I'm saying is that their morality is NOT like a human being. Yes, they do have aspects of human morals, like with the Leopard and the baby Baboon, but that same Leopard has probably stolen a kill from another Leopard leaving it to potentially starve for the day or to death like carnivores commonly do, something that we would consider immoral but to them is commonplace.

Now about Indominus. First, there is only rumors that I. rex uses raptor DNA. I know that there was a promotional image showing a raptor used in the creation of I. rex, but I think we should take the image as a grain of salt as it reuses an image from the 2005 remake of King Kong. Second, here's the source that says that Indominus rex went crazy from captivity. Look particularly at Page 84. It's on Indominus rexs article.

I only resurrected this argument because I have a feeling you're going to add those categories again. I question you about your sources because of all the times you have inserted speculation into articles and have proposed bunk theories. I'd have more respect for you if you realized your mistakes, went to correct them, and strived to be better at your logic and reasoning skills. This is why I said what I said. You for speculation and even if you're actually right about one of your claims you rarely give a source.