Board Thread:Manual of Style/@comment-1259419-20160517104930/@comment-1259419-20160528141228

Collector1 wrote: I like what you've written so far on this issue, BastionMonk, Thanks, that is good to hear.

Collector1 wrote: I think that JP: TG should have its own section. That's a good idea.

Collector1 wrote: I think we should write something like "It is presumed that Dodgson shared the same forename and worked for BioSyn like his novel counterpart, but this never mentioned in the films..." Well, that is what I ment with my Hamada example in the "No dogma's, give sources" section.

Collector1 wrote: I think it would easier if a template was created that gives text that contains information from information not found in the film itself a different color from the rest of the text written in an article. I beg to differ. I must confess I dislike that idea. I think the text and the references should be enough to make clear what is in the film and isn't. I could be wrong, ofcourse. I propose we start of without the other colors and see if the result is unclear/messy for our readers.