Thread:Animalman57/@comment-2118191-20161022073256/@comment-1187034-20161023014458

Animalman57 wrote: CrashBash wrote: How come the page was deleted? I thought everyone wanted it to be reinstated. That is a misconception. What we wanted was to found out what the genus was before adding the page back. How about naming "Labyrinthodontia" in quotations and just say in the article that it is unidentifiable? I don't think it's wise to just sit around and wait until we finally classify it as something, as the "Labyrinthodontia" could be fictionized and may not truly represent an existing species.