Thread:Carnotaur/@comment-24268306-20191017172506/@comment-24268306-20191017173803

CrashBash wrote: You called me ignorant when you could have easily said other words.

And I clearly haven't "refused to acknowledge" such research. If I had, I would have removed "Carnivore" entirely. You're the one complaining that "Carnivore" must be first when it really doesn't matter which one goes first, and switching two words around really means nothing.

?

It does. The Generalist diet category qualifies as carnivore, there is (NO) primarily faction as the spinosaurid diet as you qualify such. I only added partially piscivore category because it is the fact.

https://sp.lyellcollection.org/content/455/1/7

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734717/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250916680_Structural_performance_of_tetanuran_theropod_skulls_with_emphasis_on_the_Megalosauridae_Spinosauridae_and_Carcharodontosauridae

https://paleorxiv.org/mjt95/