Thread:Tobyv23/@comment-26923065-20151126211611/@comment-26923065-20151128112239

QuakingStar wrote: I'm with Mjamnella who is absolutely right btw... It is not quadrupedal. No way such short arms and legs could support up to 18 meters length and up to 23 tons of weight. Especially since Spinosaurus was also on land at times too. So Toby stop being ridiculous. Well, I'm not saying it wasn't quadropedal, I'm saying that we have yet to find its legs.

| Here's a video explaining why Spinosaurus could've been quadrolpedal. Although, it's somewhat biased, as the video was made last year.