Board Thread:Jurassic Park News/@comment-45.73.154.146-20171026180511/@comment-7690264-20171027191904

Also, the use of debunked in this thread is too damn high.

The Mononykus and Baby Apatosaurus (which btw look completely different) have yet to be debunked. If we want to debunk them we need either: a) the finished movie or b) their original sources. Someone saying they aren’t legit is not a debunk unless they have good evidence. In this case little evidence is needed to debunk them

On that note, no I do not take the Reddit post as truth. Like the Mononykus, how do we know that comes from the correct source? Without strong evidence we do not know the truth either way.

A note on the Concavenator - the fact that it doesn’t 100% look like a Concavenator does not debunk that possibility, because this is Jurassic park and all the dinosaurs look like shit. Additionally, if you google Concavenator you can find many an image with the duo sail configuration in the image. Meanwhile, the Ichthyovenator’s sail notch? Fossil damage I’m afraid, the animal probably didn’t have it in life.

As for maintainance of continuity, have you not seen Jurassic World? They care little for any of the original designs, looking like a child’s drawing of a JP dinosaur. Likewise, the filmmakers do not care for the novels, websites, leaflets and other such things you use to suggest that animals like Baryonyx are totally in this one you guys! Brachiosaurus? Gallimimus? Mamenchisaurus? Corythosaurus? Spinosaurus? Ceratosaurus? Pteranodon? Dimorphodon? Completely non-existent in the novels. Even Compsognathus pisses on the Procompsognathus of the novels, waving its erroneous species name behind it. Remember all those novel dinosaurs and leaflet dinosaurs that were going to be in Jurassic World? Remember how many of them were actually IN Jurassic World? 1. Apatosaurus