Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-1259419-20141019114635/@comment-27825256-20160311210107

Please re-examine what I'm saying.

Art has to be examined in three lenses: inspirations, intent, and perception.

The original inspiration is the novel which says "Corinthosaur."

Then you have the script which was, yes, 'Corinthosaur.'

Then you have the film where almost every instance of 'Corinthosaur' changed to 'Parasaurolophus.'

Preception is: Parasaurolophus is seen alive and running and a 'Corythosaur' was shown in the rolodex. The argument seems moot to me: both animals are on the island. By goof or intent, both animals are listed as "expected" species. This is then verified in JP3.

I mention the script to explain WHY Roland is saying "Cor-cory" and also to show that nearly every instance was changed to Parasaurolophus as there IS NO SUCH THING as a Corinthosaur but the animal shown is a Corythosaur.