Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-107.72.162.108-20170917165601/@comment-107.72.162.108-20170919004426

2602:306:32D4:8130:42C:E91E:5DA3:FF4A wrote: 2602:306:32D4:8130:F4E5:769C:692A:69DD wrote: CrashBash wrote: WHY are we still grasping over that dubious list again? Consider, the original list didn't even have Mononykus. This is really just grasping for that list to be real....those are too many dinosaurs. Maybe some of the dinosaurs are from Isla Sorna (because 107.72.162.108 said about the possibility of Sorna's dinosaurs removed for a grave purpose, also, he didn't say that it was real, it was a prediction), so that may count up for this film. I, too, doubt it, but it's still possible. We never had Stygimoloch, Carnotaurus, or Mononykus of any kind on Isla Nublar, so we'll see.

Yeah, maybe a lot. As we know, we could get all of the originals in the past JP movies and new ones that we thought we never saw. Bayona even confirmed it himself, and Stygimoloch, Carnotaurus, Baryonyx, Mononykus, etc., are good examples. I would find it that hard to believe that all of your dinos (including Pachyrhinosaurus), would be present on Sorna. Wait till they release a teaser photo of a Ceratosaurus in a cage and that photo will skyrocket this thread.