Thread:Dinosaurus1/@comment-6025261-20180506225538/@comment-6025261-20180514013258

Mjamnnella wrote: I think it's fine. the stygimoloch article has this information, so I don't know why it wouldn't be on the Dracorex article. All it says is "It was distinguished from other pachycephalosaurs by the row of spikes on the back of its head, behind the dome characteristic of the family." before saying it's possibly a juvenile Pachy. It's not trying to say it might not be dubious. Even the Dracorex page has something like that. "Much like Stygimoloch, Dracorex had large, protruding spikes on the back of its head, with two large horns of three behind the head. It had bumps and a long muzzle, with spikes on its nasal area." There shouldn't be this info due to it making it seem like the only choice is it is a separate genus, which clearly isn't the case as it is dubious. Plus, CrashBash fixed it at one point to my edit, so clearly, he doesn't argee to add it in. Maybe we should wait until he comes back to discuss it.