Board Thread:Video Games/@comment-71.188.98.53-20151030200019/@comment-25746161-20160120011926

MarkJira wrote: Dracel5150 wrote: DeathBubble Gaming wrote:

MarkJira wrote:

Animalman57 wrote: Dracel5150 wrote: postosuchus and edaphosaurus: possiilities! Posto- hopefully not amphibian and Edapho- hopefully not carnivore why:

Postosuchus: Prehistoric fully land dwelling crocodilian. Not amphibious. Edaphosaurus: Relative of dimetrodon, but an herbivore and otherwise completely the same. HOW WILL THESE BE PULLED OFF? Ludia would save time and effort on making the  have the same model and animation of Nundasuchus. Same with  making it have the Dimetrodon animation and model unless, although unlikely, they make a new model and animation for herbivore mammal like reptiles. Animalman is right. These creatures bear too strong a similarity to already-existing models to waste Ludia's time and effort creating all-new ones when they aren't neccesary. Agreed. Just had this idea today: cross animations over. What do you mean? I mean bring the nundasuchus animation to carnivores, still with some being amphibians, and dimetrodon animation to herbivores for edaphosaurus. Pretty much just bringing animations to other types.