Board Thread:Fossil Fuels/@comment-1259419-20151022211430/@comment-1259419-20151128155653

MarkJira wrote:

The JP movies are scientifically accurate for 1993. In the modern day, much of the series' science doesn't hold up, but in order to maintain cntinuity, the science remains unchanged.

Nowhere in the films is it mentioned that Seismosaurus was the biggest dinosaur. So, they did not have to add that into the Mr. DNA fun facts. So, the continuity-argument is jack shit here.

Furthermore. Jurassic Park IS and has always been hard science fiction. So, the shit in it is supposed to be right. New scientific insights were added to TLW and JPIII. And also JW. Is something is wrong, it is just a film goof, not a rule.

Scholarpower wrote:

IKR! Has he ever heard of Argentinosaurus, Mamenchisaurus, or Amphicoelias? Thanks for giving the first sensible comment on this thread. All they others say: "Why do you care? Jurassic Park is bullshit anyway."

I am closing this thread. I believe my life has value, don't want to spend it giving free lectures in basal logic.