Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-27255656-20171001173132/@comment-2602:306:32D4:8130:1043:D019:8BE4:489C-20171001191420

Wolverine-Man wrote: As we all know by now, the year 2014 proved to us that Spinosaurus was not the 16ft-tall, 43ft long, 10 ton reckless terrestrial killing machine that 2001's Jurassic Park III created, but rather the 40-50ft long, 7 ton four-legged aquatic fish-eater that it actually was in reality, along with the fact that it avoided confrontations with other big dinosaurs like Carcharodontosaurus. That was proven three years ago, but Spinosaurus' JPIII portrayal was a decade before that fact was proven and Spinosaurus was relatively unknown to the public back then, so those sizes were just estimates for Spinosaurus that would be proven wrong years later. Since 2018 will mark four years since the day Spinosaurus was proven to be what it was not in JPIII and what it actually was in real life, plus the release of Fallen Kingdom and the fact that the rumored T-Rex VS Spinosaurus rematch alone rose the theory that Spinosaurus would be appearing in the franchise for the first time since the third movie a decade ago, do you guys think the filmmakers will correct their mistake from JPIII and portray Spinosaurus right this time, as an aquatic fish-eater that mostly walked on four legs as opposed to the two-legged T-Rex-killing JPIII counterpart, and possibly make it even more realistic by not having it fight a T-Rex on land due to being a fish-eater and not being able to kill everything in sight, like JPIII inaccurately showed (Or perhaps Spinosaurus could try to lure the T-Rex in a lake and try to drown it or something like that), or would that JPIII monster refuse to die off from the franchise? Let me know what your thoughts are on this in the comments below, and I'll see you all soon. As you can see, in order for the realistic Spinosaurus to happen, they'll just get another sample from Spinosaurus, make it more like a crocodilian, and just make it happen. But the Spinosaurus portrayed in Jurassic Park 3 already happened; it's obviously inaccurate, but that is what Jurassic Park is about; dinosaurs with animal DNA in them, so that they are not 100% accurate. What, you think that the Spinosaurus Population on Isla Sorna would evolve to be just like the real one? It's like how Alan Grant in JP3 said "with every new discovery, it's a clean, pure, and honest fact that we learn, but what Ingen has created are theme park monsters." Just as there are raptor tribes disproving the theory that JP raptors are evolving, Spinosaurus is likely to keep its monster form. Of course, it would make sense if there was a second variation of Spinosaurus (the realistic one) in a future JP film, but the transporters doesn't care if the animal is inaccurate or not; it will appear in its monster form, just like how raptors are lucky to keep their scaly skin and oversized bodies.

Public opinion of how a dinosaur should look to its real counterpart just doesn't happen a movie later. Sure it would matter if it was 1 million years into the future, but not in just a few years.