Thread:Animalman57/@comment-4820209-20180628061131/@comment-4820209-20180628071159

See, my issue here, though, is that you were the one to revert the name change. The admins don't seem to have had an issue with it. In fact, the only other name change occurred from a random editor who renamed it after a first, casual editor made the page. I don't really think they're gonna have an issue with a verified, proper name now, all of the sudden.

And what I'm saying about Jurassic Park III is that Jurassic World is aimed to, and marketed as a sequel to Jurassic Park, right down to its tagline. It takes place after those events, references only those events and canon just exists in the case of Sorna's side, without being explicitly referenced, past external media. But it's not continuing that story from Jurassic Park III. Saying it's a sequel to JPIII is accurate, but I argue in terms of canonical events, saying it's a story-based sequel or canonical sequel to Jurassic Park is more fitting.