Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-1259419-20151215230131/@comment-1791057-20160404215508

BastionMonk wrote:

QuakingStar wrote: @Mjamnella @BastionMonk @Collector1 did you read his comments?? He may be right. I've read the comments. It is cherry picking.

I think Jhayk is soo biased against the JW websites beause they contradict his speculation about the JP Velociraptors.

Trevorrow said that things on the Masrani website ARE cannon. Trevorrow himself wrote parts of JurassicWorld.com.

The sizes of animals are NEVER given in film dialog or on screen. Prop sizes prove nothing. So, if we take this puritan movie-only methods we can not give ANY number in the size tables.

We should they neutral in what we claim in the articles. Just list all the data in movie and movie-related material the readers will have to decide what makes most sense. This is not JPLEgacy where we just chose which answer is right and present it as facts.

We are just fans. We know nothing for sure. Yeah, no. Not even close. You do realize that the JW site gives a different size compared to the size chart, correct? I have no biases, in fact I an insulted that would even think such. They're canon, but so are the sizes that the CREATORS give when they create physical props we see on screen. To deny sizes we actually see in the movie is the most ludicrous idea I've ever heard of.

Furthermore, you have insulted Jurassic Park Legacy's Encyclopedia process, and by extension much of what I've worked for. You have no idea how JPLegacy's encyclopedia process works, and if you had ever made any effort to find out you would know that it is precisely the opposite. We take the size estimates given by the props used in films because that is what is the most official source is. The films are first, all other sources are secondary.

As it stands, I am through taking your abuse. I'm done with you shitting on my integrity then turning around and ask me for help. Figure this out on your own, because I'm done here. I've never seen a Wiki so unprofessionally ran. This Wiki attracts constant trolls, blatant headcanons, and the most unscientific research I've ever encountered. Ken Ham has more knowledge of the scientific process of cataloging research. Use whatever sources you want. Mix JPOG with the books for all I care. I'll be using what's in the films.