Thread:Animalman57/@comment-1259419-20170120110334/@comment-6025261-20170120213151

BastionMonk wrote:

Animalman57 wrote: This info should be for a page like a Peltephilus/Builder page. No it is not. All admins NEVER agreed that if an animal/character only appears in a single media there should be two pages about it.

Even if that was a rule. You should not delete the entire edit. You should have moved it.

Animalman57 wrote: Also, I re-did the Erlikosaurus page to make it have the images. Yeah, AFTER I complained about it.

This kind of behaviour scares away new editors. You do this often????

I complained about you undo and you undid it again without discussing it first. This is not the kind of behavior I looking for in an admin. I took away your admin rights and will restore it when these issues are solved. Sorry. I won't do it again. And no, I don't do it often. The only reason I did it is for it to match the other pages because very few, if any any page, has the same info as you added on the Peltephilus.