Thread:HaloSpartan-44/@comment-28675190-20160930212636/@comment-28675190-20161004191623

And there have been no complete T.rex skeletons found. Also MOR 008 has NOT been debunked http://dml.cmnh.org/2006Apr/msg00205.html and this is based on something much more accurate: A head. Now judging from Sue's preportions with some variation it is at 13 meters. It also may have been a sub adult as many animals when young have larger heads disproprtianet to their bodies as a bit in Sue. The same is a bit less for MOR 008 and shows it was not done growing. So a 14 meter T.rex is most certainly not an impossibilty as reptiles and birds keep growing all their life which leads to lots of confusion and debate. Now I'm not saying Giganotosaurus is small, it was quite the opposite but it might not have had as much a potential, but still if given time might be able to reach a size of say 50 feet. Similar to T.rex as most fossil specimens are not fully grown. So who really is larger? NOBODY KNOWS!!!! although they both most certainly have a growth potentail. Supirsingly both would be relativley agile beacuse of their build such as notice how the rex skeleton is not entierly bulky but in some parts slender? The Giganotosaurus rib cage generally is also bulky but has a few more slender points. So the Gigantosaurus may be more agile but the Rex got dat bite. You can read my blog post on it and comment what you like. So matching up these two things in the first place is stupid as there is no ideal way to see who is better.