Thread:Dinosaurus1/@comment-33613830-20180609190124/@comment-33613830-20180615173542

Alright, so thinking more critically about the Extinction Now! movement's possible impact on Jurassic World III, they might go directly against the DPG's motives.

Dinosaur Protection Group: Save the dinosaurs!

Extinction Now: Don't save the dinosaurs!

I found some things that the EN got right: First off, they are scared and worried that the dinosaurs that were saved by the DPG could cause chaos and take more lives again, and this is understandable. However, the DPG is warm-hearted at the core, as they do tell the truth of what happened in the JP History, whereas the EN told none; all they remember were the incidents, namely and primarily the San Diego Incident and Jurassic World Incident.

Here's my theory (I haven't watched the film yet): the DPG saves the dinosaurs, but the EN is concerned about the whole thing, and the entire film goes political over whether to choose the dinosaurs or the humans. And if you think about it critically, that is a really hard choice to make, considering that there are very little dinosaurs and that we have some dinosaurs that we have a bond with (ex. Blue and Stiggy). For example, if we say "support the EN!", then that is basically including Blue and Stiggy for death.

Oh yeah, and did I mention that the debate is already stirring? https://twitter.com/AntiSaurusGroup/status/1002795727624572928

Jurassic World III will be very politically complex.

P.S. Also, do you think that brand new illegally cloned species will appear in Jurassic World III?