Thread:Animalman57/@comment-6025261-20191014211514/@comment-2118191-20191015132417

"CrashBash you don't undesrtand my post and ignore valid points I have raised, you are only focusing on the things which you dislike and being biased. Then again it's to be expected since you are an admin and therefore think that because you have that position and power, your opinion is the gospel."

Wrong. You should know for a fact that I'm not an admin. And you're saying I'm doing EXACTLY what you're doing, which is hypocritical. If you're complaining about all the ZT2 animals, then why aren't you complaining about the "lazy" ZT1 animals, such as the Blackbuck, the Olive Baboon, the Caudipteryx, the aforementioned tuna, all the mythological animals (especially the Bigfoot and Nessie), the Arctic and Mexican wolves, the White Tiger and the Black Leopard? At least in ZT2 the Black Leopard was unique in it being the only leopard.

"I love and prefer obscure animal species if they are interesting and unique- Okapi, Bongo, Japanese Searow and Snow Leopard as example."

Then why did you mention the Gelada as a "rubbish" animal, when they are as unique as they get? It's hardly bad or redundant...it's literally the last surviving member of its family.

"However, people chose the lazy way and put in animals like a giant camel, a giant warthog, a tiny fox/wolf thing and a deer with ugly horns."

Wrong, again. They're clearly not being lazy, they're providing variety. You're just suggesting reptiles from the Mesozoic period, whilst ZT2 was covering ALL eras. Besides, they also included the Dodo, Gigantopithecus, Doedicurus and Thylacine that you so desperately want.

"However, your words indicate you want extinct pigs and camels which look almost identical to their modern relatives, instead of these unique and interesting animals, plenty of which are obscure and rarely focused on in popular culture."

Wrong again. I never said that, stop putting words in my mouth. You're the one hating on obscure animals. Besides, once again, you're being hypocritical - since you're praising JW:E....with virtually all the dinosaurs being remodels of at least one other. You hate a random deer but you're fine with Gigantspinosaurus? Crichtonsaurus? Pachycephalosaurus, Stygimoloch AND Dracorex all in the same game?

You're not helping your argument at all here. Or are these dinosaurs immune to criticism? Oh wait, they can't be, since you're seemingly fine with Caudipteryx yet you hate Protarchaeopteryx, and you love Megaloceros yet despise Eucladoceros...what's the difference? Explain, please.