Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-194.83.57.1-20150630111757/@comment-26950258-20160502230913

Spinocroc123 wrote: KingOfKretaceous wrote:

Spinocroc123 wrote:

KingOfKretaceous wrote:

Spinocroc123 wrote:

68.234.208.24 wrote: Jack Horner is full of shit when it comes to common sense. A dinosaur as big as T.rex cannot purely on scavenging to support its massive size. It would spend a ridiculous amount of time and energy looking for carcasses which doesn't guarantee a good meal. Remember that most modern day carnivores aren't obligated scavengers either. I don't see why T.rex would have a strong jaws only to pick up scraps from other animals. what you said makes no sense. t rex's arms were increadbly weak and if he'd fall over he could'nt get up due to his tiny little arms, and the abillity to get up after falling is the most basic thing any hunter should have. plus certain caculations done on t rex's legs suggest that he could'nt run fast at all. meaning that he couldn't be a huter.

a more detailed explanation of tht theory is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzhDVW9ZVGU. I'm assuming you don't know what ambush means.. i'm assuming that you're not here with good intentions. and to your knowledge- i actually know what ambush means, and it could sometimes work out for a lucky t rex. but still since no one directly disproved Horner's claims in the documentry i linked in my previous comment, they are still valid. K However, some guy linked me to a website that said that Horner now doesn't believe in that theory. i'm not sure if this is actually true though. Maybe it was all the hate from Rex fanboys