Thread:JurassicMisfits/@comment-33613830-20180304021345/@comment-34832962-20180304182458

Dinosaurus1 wrote: JurassicMisfits wrote: What is it that I exactly say is so similar? And yes I do work on Voice Acting, but these days who hasn't?

Really; Mind if I see a similar comment from this gent? Well, you regarded that Hoplitosaurus as the Unidentified Ankylosaur Carcass, despite there being no confirmation. Here, you use paleontological speculation as proof, instead of sources and confirmations. Ibarber did this too with the Allosaurus page.

Also, you reverting my edit and saying that it is a Hoplitosaurus without confirmation really fuels my suspicion. I remember about reading that and going to lie everything he pointed out with Allosaurus was right in the end. Plus isn't this whole franchise about dinosaurs? So it's logical to use Paleontological evidence on a movie that centers around dinosaurs. Common sense

Besides you had this similar problem when you complained about the Pachyrhinosaurus being switched to Sinoceratops despite the fact you knew it looked nothing like a Pachyrhinosaurus.

So I really don't see the problem here. From what this ibarber guy was saying, despite he spewed out the "acid tongue" he wasn't entirely wrong. I think if we use Paleontological evidence a little in the JP it would help improve the wiki a little more and educate Jurassic Park fans, since we have a wide range of famous Jurassic Park fans that come to this wiki and use our information as analysis. I say we put it up for a vote; do you agree?