Thread:Animalman57/@comment-6025261-20171208022644/@comment-34865525-20171208190715

I don't think that the one-horned ceratopsid is actually supposed to be a Styracosaurus; instead, the shape of its frill, the hornlets, and the nasal horn suggest to me that we are instead looking at a significantly more obscure Sinoceratops.

If this is the case, kudos to Universal for not going with the reasonably well-known Styracosaurus to fill the role of the not-Triceratops and instead opting for something that isn't as popular.