Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-95.91.175.60-20151027170948/@comment-31811098-20151029023116

95.91.175.60 wrote: I can't stop chuckling, the more I think about it; and it seems noone else notices this (really?):

Why in the world is the "Indominus Rex" called "indominus"? - who would want to name this aggressive carnivore like that?!?

This [laughable] mistake seems very strange, since in times of the internet, any piece of information, any double-check only seems one click away? - they could have figured this out incredibly easily!

I guess it'S rather obvious that they meant to name him (the king) as "unruly" or something like that - but instead his name translates to "un-lordly", "un-authoritative", "un-bossy" or "un-tyrannical"; certainly not what the writers were going for, right?

If they wanted to give it a name that implies it being "unruly", or "uncontrollable", the words "indomiTus" and/or "indomabilis" would have been the way to go... unless they meant to imply that "Indominus Rex" was a gentle giant xD  (wolf in sheeps glothing?)

stupid writers are stupid. Funny shit! ... But it certainly does hurt the athmosphere of the movie to notice this embarrassing fauxpas!

Do I see the word s**t?