Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-2602:306:32D4:8130:7905:1F9F:EA8E:3741-20170921003325/@comment-2118191-20170922131639

2602:306:32D4:8130:547C:944:41B7:A9A5 wrote: So? Still, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom could be slightly longer than its predecessor, for all I care. Of course, Sonic Boom and E.T. are stupid as f*ck, but now let's compare Sonic Boom's production time with Jurassic World: Evolution's time (yes I know that JW:E is still in production). Sonic Boom was awful, but think about it; one more year from now, and JW:E could be a masterpiece; best video game of all time. Same thing with JW:FK. Could be the best film and the longest.

Oh, so you've clearly played JW:E, then? No, of course you haven't. So you can't SAY it's any good. And I've already countered your argument...Sonic Boom was in development far, FAR longer than E.T., and they're both terrible games.

And what kind of argument is "Could be the best film and the longest"? That doesn't make any sense, and you full well know it doesn't. I've known movies that are 2.5 hours in length and they've been PANNED by critics and viewers alike, whilst some films that are only 75 minutes long have been praised. Length means NOTHING in terms of whether a movie is good or bad.

I don't understand your logic. OK, so they spent more time filming JW:FK, but that really doesn't guarantee that the movie will be longer. It could be the same length for all we know.