Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-166.137.248.31-20170831135037/@comment-2602:306:32D4:8130:89B1:C437:E78B:740D-20170911225005

CrashBash wrote: 41.40.44.53 wrote: 2602:306:32D4:8130:B020:98BF:E533:BD92 wrote: CrashBash wrote: Honestly, I'd rather there wasn't a whole dinosaurs alongside Cenozoic creatures, because then they'd be fighting for each other's attention. I agree (and so did the creator) that the Dinosaurs are just overpowered compared to the Cenozoic Creatures. There's just no way the CC's could win against the dinos. Even Indricotherium (or more scientifically Paraceratherium) is no match for a T.Rex, because clearly, T.Rex has the bite advantage. That's why the creator doesn't want Dinosaurs for this film, CrashBash. The sequels maybe, but not Cenozoic Park (film). Also, if the sequels would have dinosaurs in them, then will they be considered spin-offs, along with the original film? I doubt it. A paracer would be very difficult for a T.rex to kill.

Not really. It's essentially a smaller hadrosaur, which T. rex naturally hunts. Well, looks like I misunderstood your sentence, 41.40.44.53. I thought you were reffering that Indricotherium can be easily killed by T-Rex. Sorry.

But how will that play out in the sequels? Imagine a T-Rex v.s. Woolly Mammoth battle, A Velociraptor v.s. Smilodon duel, Triceratops v.s. Coelodonta clash, A Gallimimus v.s. Phorusrhacos fight, or even a T-Rex, Woolly Mammoth, Smilodon, Velociraptor, and Human Guard v.s. a hybrid, Dinosaur or Cenozoic. Ohh, I understand that you guys want it to be a spinoff but I want it to be a movie so bad. This is just so great.