Thread:Gsbr/@comment-26923065-20151125022603/@comment-2253059-20151125235316

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: All of your links point to me disagreeing with you.

That doesn’t change the fact that you lied about doing nothing wrong, you lied about when the apparent avatar issue occurred, you lied about considering the debate pointless, you lied about me contacting multiple people in your family and multiple friends of yours, and you constantly lie about proving me wrong. Your inability to directly contest certain links speaks volumes.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: Your entire contention centers around me being blunt with you.

There is a difference between being blunt and being mean-spirited, especially when you were trying to force me to accept your point of view. You started the debate, you continued the debate when it should have ended the first time and when it should have ended with JAH’s interference. There are also the matters of your dishonesty, your inability to admit when you are wrong, and your inability to take responsibility for your own actions.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: If i became so resolute and unmoving then it was your job to either keep discussing a futile debate with me or moving on with your life. You chose the former. I then exercised my right to remain uninterested in what amounted, to me personally, as repetition of a old and tired argument you kept presenting.

You also chose the former, despite my arguments being “old and tired.” You restarted the debate weeks after it originally ended. You interrupted a conversation on my message wall to continue the debate. You made a wall post solely dedicated to the debate. You did all of this, despite apparently not being interested in what I had to say. You could have just ignored me; I wasn’t contacting you, you were contacting me. But you didn’t. And when I did try to leave, you wouldn’t even allow me to be entitled to my own opinion. You felt the need to claim I was conceding. So you can’t take the high road here.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: And I still feel that way, but that's ok - it's not a crime to disagree or be disinterested in what someone has to say when they become rote and overly wordy and it is not a violation of wiki TOS.

It is a violation of this Wikia’s flamewar prevention rules (http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:29528).You did not keep your comments respectful and you included extra sentences that did not improve your argument. Which I acknowledge I violated too by not keeping my comments short. Your condescending and insulting remarks were abusive, which is a violation of the TOU. Being mean-spirited isn’t illegal, but it’s not acceptable conduct either, except in perhaps life or death situations, which this is not. Again, you could have just ignored me.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: Every post made to you has been in response to you addressing me. It's not my obligation to agree with anything you say and I have right to form an opinion about your arguments and I do believe they are weak and ill formed. That's my right and you had every right to say the same about mine.

I’m not asking you to agree with me, I’m asking you to acknowledge my arguments and prove they are “weak and ill formed.” When you are involved in a debate, it is your obligation to acknowledge and directly contest your opponent’s arguments. That is how progress is made. You do not fulfill that obligation; you disregard what I write and you even flat-out stated you wouldn’t give my arguments a “fair shake.”

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: However of the two of us only you crossed the line.

You came to my message wall first. You tried force me to accept your opinion, despite never refuting my arguments. You made a wall post about me, vehemently claimed there was nothing wrong with it, and after it was deleted by JAH, you begrudgingly apologized by blaming me for its creation and insisting what I did was worse than you. You requested me to “debate” you, only to continue with insults and the condescending attitude. You would not stop posting on my wall and you still won’t stop. You’re not the innocent person you’ve convinced yourself that you are.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: You took my photo and uploaded it. That is a violation.

You are clinging to a small matter that was already settled by JAH. You can vilify me all you want, it means nothing when you have no evidence to prove your allegation.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: You stalked me on the internet finding that image -The image that you took wasn't from my twitter or even my facebook,

You’re only saying I “stalked” you because FishTank implanted that idea in your mind. You have a shirtless picture on your Twitter, linked directly to your Wikia account. You don’t care if people see your face and chest anyways.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: finding my twitter, and finding my mother. That is a violation.

Anything public on your social media profiles is fair game for viewing purposes, especially when you have your Twitter directly linked to your Wikia account, and one of your Tweets contains the URL of your Facebook.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: You then contacted my mother and shared information from my twitter with her in an attempt to paint some twisted picture of me and as a result when she found out who you where she was almost in tears - thinking that you may have known more about her and information regarding her security. Cause I sure didn't give it you. I did initially find it funny - That impression changed when my mother became visibly distraught.

It is a stone cold fact that you insulted and demeaned me for having a different opinion. Act like a child and you’ll be treated like one. Again, you still have no evidence that your mother was distraught. You also edited your message to say “It won’t work,” as if you were suddenly concerned you were going to get in trouble. Then you deleted it.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: You made the decision to take things to that extreme. I stand by everything I have said to you and there is nothing wrong with that. Disagreeing is a part of life. However, the difference between me and you is that I didn't take to the point you did.

I’ve already acknowledged my actions were extreme. You, on other hand, still defend your own conduct. Disagreeing with people is one thing, demeaning them for having a different opinion is another. Not allowing them to be entitled to their own opinion is another – especially when you’re unable to prove there is anything wrong with their opinion. Mjamnnella and I disagree over whether or not certain information is relevant, but our conversation has remained civil throughout. The difference between you and me is I can admit when I am wrong and you can’t.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: Also My facebook isn't linked on my profile. And even if you went to my twitter via my wikia profile - it still had nothing to do with our discussion and it definitely had nothing to do with my mother and there is no link here or on my twitter that links to my facebook or mother.

If you include a link to your Twitter, there are no rules preventing me from visiting it and reading it. Technically speaking, insults aren’t relevant to a discussion either. Like I said above, one of your Tweets contains your Facebook URL.

BadlyBruisedMuse wrote: So yes you stalked me and if you do it again I will report you. Absolutely.

So long as you continue to be a bully, I will continue to stand up against you.