Thread:BattleshipMan/@comment-35435751-20190703201728/@comment-33613830-20190707195032

Varg2000 sent me a message.

''First off, all wikis provide facts, but they also provide fiction (for instance, the Jurassic Park Wiki claims that the JP3 Spinosaurus was 15 meters, when there seems to be no supporting evidence to it and everything I can find states it as being 13 meters), and I fail to see what this point has to do with the petition in question or even how it supposedly justifies blocking me. Further, there are many controversial topics in regards to any franchise, but something merely being controversial doesn't explain how I was deserving of being blocked for posting it. I've already argued that the rematch is generally desirable more than it is generally despised (which makes sense considering most fans are T-Rex-fans and there's only really a vocal minority of Spino-fans complaining about it), therefore there's no good reasoning behind the idea that the rematch would cause any significant backlash, and if anything, it would set the record straight and unite the fanbase (and Trevorrow is already sympathetic and supportive towards the fanbase asking for it, and thereby recognizes the need for it, and addressing an issue that has persisted for two decades without resolution). But this is irrelevant to the current discussion, as it has no bearing at all on me being blocked, especially not if it's an issue of disagreement of opinion or preference (which you seem to be describing and which would make the block even more unjustified).''

''Second, the "multiple evidence" you're referring to are the two Wikipedia articles on Tyrannosaurus and Spinosaurus as well as a post from Quora. That's hardly anything significant to go on, considering (1) the 2014 study which proposed Spinosaurus as being 15 meters is outdated and the 2018 study merely repeats what was concluded in the 2014 study and disregarding what we currently know about the length of Spinosaurus, (2) the post from Quora talks about the specimens known as "FSAC-KK 11888" (which is the largest known Spinosaurus at around 11 meters long, 2 meters tall, and 3 tons) and "MNSM V4047" (which is currently assigned to Sigilmassasaurus as of 2018 and NOT Spinosaurus), and (3) CrashBash is arguing that length is the determining factor for size, whereas in reality we judge size by overall mass, in which case Tyrannosaurus obviously comes out on top, unless you want to argue that an animal like Titanoboa was larger than Tyrannosaurus as well. All in all, I rejected the comments CrashBash made because they were demonstrably false, not because I supposedly wanted to believe Tyrannosaurus to be larger. Also noting that you conveniently ignored my responses to CrashBash.''

''Third, I repeat, there is no evidence whatsoever of me having "insulted and denying having insulted" other users, as was already cleared up in the thread you just mentioned, but throughout that thread you will find accusation after accusation but without any supporting evidence. However, since the thread seems to be currently inaccessible (which makes me suspect somebody is trying to bury the truth) there is no way to verify what went down in that thread. And once more, me referring to CrashBash as a "twelve year old" was the closest to an "insult" you would ever find, and I never denied calling him that, and by the context of that quote of mine I was clearly trying to address a very juvenile behavior on CrashBash's part while trying to have a civilized discussion. That was hardly meant to come across as "rude or insulting" and frankly this is petty reasoning if anything, and I still stand by what I said in regards to ME being the one who's being mistreated here. Further, the very fact that you hypocritically attempt to paint me as "being in denial" here seems to suggest you're trying quite desperately to justify blocking me even though you know that you have no justifiable charges to use against me.''