Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-73.195.4.48-20150626163853/@comment-1187034-20151209224709

Dinowolf56 wrote: so its sub adult right? Collector1 wrote: Okay, from now on in this discussion, the sub-adult argument shall not be used. At least three people (myself) included has come to the conclusion that it is speculation. As I posted previously, the JPIII rex is about the size as the Tyrannosaur Buck from. As for the belief that it is a sub-adult based on color, if that were the case, Junior should be brighter than his father, but this doesn't seem to be the case save for some red in his coloration.

Apparently this anonymous user thinks that because Jurassic Park Legacy believes this it must be true. Though the guys that made Jurassic Park: The Game used them for information, they are not an official source. In fact, regarding the rex from JPIII, their article about Tyrannosaurus, after giving the evidence for JPIII rex being a sub-adult, they write, and I quote: "This has lead some people to think that it could be a sub-adult, though not much is given to support this claim, save the size."

Yet, despite a lack of evidence except for the animal's size, they identify the Tyrannosaurus as a sub-adult. I find this too speculative to consider in this argument and I think it shouldn't be taken into account from now on as we've gone over it several times now and this isn't a discussion on whether or not the Jurassic Park III T. rex was fully grown.