Thread:Collector1/@comment-4655954-20150531040007/@comment-2253059-20150531080657

Your claims are not supported by reality. I wrote a lengthy response to you that made note of everything you said. You responded with a mere 17 words, claiming what I said was wrong for no other reason than the fact that you're saying I'm wrong. Those are both facts. It is also a fact that your refusal to address my points coincided with me establishing that my argument was based around perception of the English language, not proper grammar.

Collector1, BadlyBruisedMuse is demonstrating here that he is a delusional individual. I don't want be insulting and I know this doesn't make me look good, but it's true. He is trying to claim he refuted me when if you visit my message wall, you will see I responded to every single statement he made, while he began hiding behind blanket statements when we last spoke and he continues to hide behind them. "It is more accurate to say that she was dropped, which is literally what happened" - Blanket statement. "Dropped is also a neutral term and more accurately depicts what what happened to Zara." - Blanket statement. "Fall does not." - Blanket statement. "I already explained why to you extensively." - Blanket statement. "You were unable to reconcile my explanations with your sporadic understanding of written English precedence." He is demonstrating he is out of touch with reality through all of these vague, inaccurate claims, and thus his word should be dismissed.