Thread:Animalman57/@comment-31330278-20190227010622/@comment-1734776-20190227225821

I must interject and decline some of these speculations, as there is no sufficient proof or direct contradiction from official word.

"Some weird people on the internet think Masie was a prototype for Indoraptor. Do you think they say it because she's likely part raptor as well, or just because Indoraptor is just tragic enough to sympathetic? On a personal note: Indoraptor is the only JP villain who ever earned my sympathy, mainly because he was the only JP villain who never betrayed anyone and suffered more than most of the characters in the franchise. I respect those who think Indoraptor is worse than Ludlow (most of the other villains are most certainly worse than Indoraptor), but i strongly disagree, because people who throw their own uncle unter the train for money and power are not to be sympathized. I also respect those who see him as worse than I-Rex, despite not agree at all. "

Colin Trevorrow confirmed there are no human-dino hybrids in the World movies.

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1034693967231807488?lang=en

"Some people say Spino-Rex is more powerful than I-Rex. They use many arguements (i can answer to each and every argument), but the only legit one is that Spino-Rex was destructive in meta-level (the animatronic alone destroyed the t-rex animatronic for real and injured Tea Leoni for real), not to mention ruined Isla Sorna and having a part of the franchise's 14 years coma. I personally hold it against him. Do you also hold it against him, or in his favor? "

People that say the Spinosaurus is stronger than the Indominus rely on far too much speculation and not actual, verifiable feats and facts. This is all covered somewhat extensively in this https://www.reddit.com/r/CharacterRant/comments/9tgayp/various_jurassic_park_dinosaur_complaints_and/ Reddit topic.

As for this notion that the Spinosaurus was "confirmed" by canon material to be a hybrid, that is downright incorrect, and even Jack Ewins claimed it was intentionally ambiguous (thus why I removed that speculation from the Spino article itself).

https://twitter.com/Jack_Ewins/status/1060962968131813376

The Spinosaurus was intentionally bred, so it would not really qualify as an "accident." It was an illegal species and wouldn't have been on InGen's list, otherwise the InGen employees that did the cloning and experiments would have been incriminating themselves.

The rest is speculation that would go round and round, but these are facts.