Thread:Animalman57/@comment-33613830-20171222210230/@comment-34030923-20171224214830

CrashBash wrote: Hypnobrai wrote: CrashBash wrote: Did they specifically say "species", though? And the only word we have on Giganotosaurus is something that wasn't even in English.

Does it really have to be in English? lol

Apparently yes because some people then decided that it also confirmed Kritosaurus, when the actual translation didn't even say Kritosaurus, but "Cryptosaurus".

Basically, there's room for doubt due to translation errors. But Cryptosaurus is only known from 1 piece of bone, so its impossible to know what it even looked like.

Also, I believe Kritosaurus is confirmed because it came from a proper source; Bayona's Twitter. The writer of the article must know about the messed up translations, and corrected them and then came the leak.

Also, even if the points of the leak are countered, it is very clear to see them, especially the Pachycephalosaurian Indoraptor, which was noticed by a lot of people, like GamingBeaver.