Thread:Collector1/@comment-25800883-20160227104108/@comment-25238001-20160228170333

Tobyv23 wrote:

MarkJira wrote:

FireTerryTiger wrote: oh

But the I.rex still has dna of few dinosaurs that makes it scavenger I'm not sure about your logic here. In the Jurassic Park movies, both T.rex and Velociraptor are very active hunters. I don't know about the rest, because they haven't been seen onscreen, but you have to understand that Jurassic Park's dinosaurs aren't identical to their real-life counterparts. Rexy looks and acts entirely different from how a real one would. Could you explain the difference between the behaviour of Rexy and a regular T. rex? Well, there's been some debate for nearly three decades as to whether or not T.rex was a hunter or a scavenger. Rexy is very obviously a hunter, so that may or not be true-to-life. Also, the "visual acuity based on movement" is a fallacy, and not something that T.rex actually would've had. Rexy moves a lot faster than a regular T.rex as well, and persists for ridiculous amounts of time in hunting down a single prey item, something a real T.rex probably would not have done.