Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-26025032-20150611214822/@comment-108.209.116.49-20150612164115

109.175.232.192 wrote: 108.209.116.49 wrote: Come on! Are you all that thick in the head! Of course you have to compare the movies. Without Jurassic Park there would not be any movie fallowing it, and those that fallowed have had epic failure especially three and now four. Fore this reason alone. You have scientifically inacurate dinosaur who do not have proto-feathers, a hybrid dinosaur, and a horrible reference sequence of the first film. This movie was nothing short of a Indiana Jones: Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,  Studios rapping, cockratch in popcorn movie. Never have I been more dissapointed in a movie that shows nothing less of poor acting, poor dinosaurs, and a unforgetable plot line flop. You would have to be drunk or a retard to enjoy this film. That's your opinion and just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have the right to try and put others down for liking it. I'm not going to debate this with you since I respect your right to hold that opinion but considering you've already b***hed on here about Elephant777 just for making the post because you have a problem with them so I'm perplexed by you having said you won't see the movie because it's already ruined by the OP you then further commented saying how bad you thought it was and not really in any great detail. Firstly the feather thing personally I'm glad they didn't do that there's been enough documentaries out there that have done that and considering the extent to how feathered some were is unknown it's likely you either get too little which pisses of science purists or too much which makes the creature look like a joke. Secondly the hybrid dinosaur was the main point of the story and we were made aware of this ages ago so if you didn't like the idea then why the f**k are you paying to see something you already don't like? I mean that's obviously going to effect your opinion in the first place. The reference to the first film well I didn't have a problem with it, most references were subtle nods to what's gone before even the inclusion of Dr Malcolm's book was exactly that and the only direct reference to the original was John Hammond, Dr Henry Wu as well granted but, considering most things said about Hammond was that he told Masrani on his death bed to "spare no expense" and that Masrani threatened Wu saying Hammond's not around to protect you this time well I don't see what's wrong with linking to past films in the franchise. The finding of the original visitor centre is more for the fanbase sake than anything else and you get reference to the banner, night vision goggles, old jeeps, etc ... Come on even Rexy herself is in the film and her fight is well done granted she doesn't get as much screen time as I would have liked but even so when she is present it's a great nod to the original especially having the velociraptor Blue team up with her to kill Indominus Rex switching up the T Rex vs Raptors in the original. I'm sorry but if you are going to call it the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull of the Jurassic Park films and say it exhibits poor acting, poor dinosaurs and a plot flop please enlighten us all. You've said about the feathers and that is a matter of opinion but you are forgetting the film is a science fiction movie and obviously will have elements that are not accurate and if you paid attention you would have noticed Dr Wu himself acknowledges the InGen dinosaurs aren't wholly accurate anyway they never have been since they have always used frog DNA to fill in the gene sequence so obviously it isn't 100% dinosaur. The acting I didn't have anything wrong with I thought each character was believable and well portrayed, the story though in some parts felt a little rushed for me I thought on the whole was very good it was simple and didn't detract from what it wanted to do by throwing dinosaurs in our face just for the sake of it. If you found a plot line flop please share it I'd love to here what you found as I don't recall anything though I will acknowledge pretty much all films will have some inconsistencies somewhere even minor ones. If you are going to say the movie is bad can you please elaborate to make a valid point, why is it bad? Why was it the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull JP movie? Why was the acting poor? Why were the dinosaurs poor? What was the plot line flop? Most important of all why must we be drunk or retarded to enjoy a movie?

Fair enough. I'll give you a full review later on today if you are still fallowing this form