Board Thread:Fossil Fuels/@comment-1259419-20140912072926/@comment-2118191-20171018052905

2602:306:32D4:8130:2824:4B1C:8C48:7A6B wrote: Animalman57 wrote: 2602:306:32D4:8130:D463:73C5:C747:6085 wrote: Maybe this thing is a crocodile itself. I'm not 100% sure, but maybe it's just me wondering. I got my wondering from an IP User called 107. He may be wrong in his points, but maybe it's just me. It is impossible for spino to be a crocodile. Its' clear from the bones we have that it is a non-avian dinosaur. Well, unless we have more studies on the bones and structures and whatnot of Spinosaurus, maybe I'll consider your point in that Spinosaurus is a dinosaur. The bones we have are enough to prove that Spinosaurus is a dinosaur. It absolutely cannot be a crocodile. It's like trying to call Pteranodon a bat, or Ichthyosaurus a fish - it just isn't possible.