Thread:Animalman57/@comment-25238001-20160524123748/@comment-25238001-20160524195322

Animalman57 wrote: MarkJira wrote: Far enough.
 * UPDATE* Found it. But is that Corythosaurus? The page says it could potentially be Hypacrosaurus. I know, but for now, I think its' fine. Besides, there is no unidentified hadrosaur page.