Board Thread:Video Games/@comment-6025261-20161217035447/@comment-31108288-20170322230404

73.27.135.125 wrote: Zeiram1990 wrote: I wish ALL the animals from my suggestions comments will be put into the game someday. And maybe make a 4th, Paleozoic park- with Triassic dinosaurs, synapsids, archosaurs, arthropods and amphibians. There should be 3 animal types in all 4 parks: Amphibious(Remove Amphibians from Land), Desert and Swamp. Ludia goofed up big time by putting Arthropleura in the Glacier Park(Jurassic Park: Builder). I can tolerate the 2 crocodilians in Glacier Park, however. I love this idea but Luidia probably won't go for it. 1. Is that it would probably take up to much data and the game would be better off without it. 2. Is that taking away amphibians from the Jurassic Park wouldn't make sence, it was built for four animal types, like herbivores would be good against flyers and that makes sence cause A long-neck could reach up and snatch it out of the air. Carnivores being good against herbivores makes sence cause that's what they mostly snacked on. But flyers being good against carnivores? That just doesn't make sence.

Sorry I replied so late, but I was busy with many things, including posting my ZT2 screenshots on Deviantart. I thank you for liking my idea. But here is my answer: 1-the game would be better off without it I disagree. While it would take up too much data, it would be better *with* it. Animals will be divided in Amphibious(all amphibians and crocodiles, including new ones like Beelzebufo, Gerrothorax, Deinosuchus and Crassigyrinus), Swamp(arthropods like, spiders, scorpions, millipedes, and dragonflies; as well as archosaurs like Postosuchus, Desmatosuchus, Scutosaurus and Effigia) and Desert(synapsids like Dimetrodon, Placerias, Moschops, Edaphosaurus, Gorgonopsid, and Estemmenosuchus; as well as Triassic dinosaurs like Plateosaurus, Coelophysis, Herrerasaurus and Liliensternus). 2-Battles for the Land Park are harder specifically because it has 1 more animal type than the team number(4-3), giving the enemy an unfair advantage. I have lost *alot* more Land battles, than Marine and/or Cenozoic. Adding insult to injury, you cannot see what you will be fighting, until *after* you press the enter fight button, making you already screwed. Also not all herbivores have long necks. Real reason why they beat flyers is because they are too big, spiky, horny and armored for the delicate pterosaurs. As for carnivores, they can fly over them and peck them to death lol. But seriously, there is evidence pterosaurs ate baby dinosaurs(of course dinosaurs also ate pterosaurs, so I guess it's a cycle of nature thing...). In all fairness JP: B and JW: tG aren't very logical/accurate. IRL a Triceratops and an Ankylosaurus could kill a T. rex, while Ludia made them the weakest animals. Meanwhile, Scaphognathus and Tanycolagreus while small and weak IRL, are very powerful(non-hybrid) animals in the game. This is from the same game, which gives Allosaurus and Giganotosaurus 2 fingers AND classifies a marine crocodile(Metriorhyncus) as a land-dwelling amphibian... -_-