Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-26155014-20160125165705/@comment-25238001-20160125222941

71.168.238.21 wrote:

MarkJira wrote:

71.168.238.21 wrote:

Edaphosaurus wrote: As I consider Jurassic Park to be a near perfect film my only changes would be to make everything accurate, including the dodgy science e.g. the Lysine contingency, as well as the rather poor creature designs.

The sequals could be improved by their not existing. I found the creature desgins in JP to be quite nice. I also found the second and fourth sequels to be good. While the designs are very nice to look at, I think Edaphosaurus was getting at more scientifically accurate designs. Agreed. I'm surprised he still goes on this wiki as he doesn't like JP/JW. You're entirely wrong. To quote Edaphosaurus, earlier on in this very thread, "  I consider Jurassic Park to be a near perfect film".