User blog comment:BastionMonk/Dinosaurs that deserve attention/@comment-213.122.116.225-20130407102618

Apatosaurus is one that I would like to see as well.

Carnotaurus I would have to agree with as well - enough time as passed since Disney's "Dinosaur" film came out that they can use it.

Another type of Pterosaur, like Cearadactylus would be very good to see as Pteranodon hogs that spotlight in popular culture, but there would have to be an explanation of why it wasn't seen in the avirary sequence in JPIII - a second aviary perhaps because the two had to be kept apart?

Although I would like to see Euoplocephalus, it has to be asked if it is different enough from Ankylosaurus to appear on screen? The game, fine, but maybe not the film.

Maiasaura desperately needs to put in an appearance, I cannot think of a good reason to not include it in the next film.

Microceratus, Mussaurus and Ornitholestes would probably end up being little more than cameos.

Othniela (or any kind of Hypsilophodontid needs an appearance.

Could Proceratosaurus be made different enough from Ceratosaurus to justify its appearance? For that matter is Segisaurus visually different enough to warrant inclusion? I'm not sure.

As for Styracosaurus, how the hell has this one not been included long before now? It's one of the most visually striking dinosaurs going - even a mere cameo would be memorable.

Yangchuanosaurus is an interesting option. An Allosaurid dinosaur needs to appear and this would be a good one to have if they choose not to include Allosaurus itself.

But there are still Dinosaurs that have already appeared in the films that need more attention - Pachycephalosaurus and Gallimimus disappear completely in JPIII, and Triceratops and Stegosaurus had little more than cameos.