Board Thread:Jurassic Park News/@comment-166.137.248.31-20170823195846/@comment-2118191-20170824192039

166.137.248.31 wrote: The list is only 40-41 creatures long: 16 carnivores, 15 herbivores, 3 pterosaurs, 3 aquatic creatures, 1 non-dinosaur (which is a giant crocodilian) and 2-3 hybrids. That is the number that people wanted in the past, right? Imagine a list of over 50 dinosaurs. That amount is just enough to prove that that list is fake. Bayona's film might be likely to include LESS than 50 creatures ( like my discovery), to avoid the film from being too great and random. I did read your 'you can say that it is real all you want', so I will have to find only one option to make you believe me by the slightest idea: wait until the film comes out. When it does, we will see if either one is right, but for now, this thread is just a prediction.

No, 40 is too much. Look at all the other Jurassic Park movies, and tell me how many animals they have. I think the highest number barely reaches double-figures, if that. You don't seem to understand that this is a movie, not a video game.

This list is not a prediction, it is a fake. It is clearly fake because it is too big, too random, and you have no source to back it up other than "I saw it, but my computer exploded so I can't show you". Given how desperately you're trying to defend it, it's obvious you made it up. I'm not humouring this anymore than I have to.