Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-27255656-20171001173132/@comment-107.72.162.53-20171001213912

41.40.95.81 wrote: Wolverine-Man wrote: A four-legged aquatic fish-eater Nope. Just nope. It was NOT a quadreped.

Also I would rather have Suchomimus or Baryonyx which WE KNOW on isla nublar rather than Spino.

Also we DID see spinosaurus in the holoscape which means there is a very small chance of it appearing. And many of the JW creatures were individually cloned not taken from Sorna so the JW spino (Which has a very small chance of existing) might be more accurate. You are right in the fact that the Holoscape creatures (not just Spinosaurus, but also Allosaurus, Lesothosaurus, Elaphrosaurus, Plesiosaurus, and even Deinonychus) could have a small chance of appearing, but Baryonyx and Suchomimus have a greater chance of appearing than Spinosaurus. However, what if the uncredited dinosaurs in the Holiscape were planned to be attractions after Indominus Rex.

Also, you are right that Spinosaurus did not walk on 4 legs; Sigilmassasauris did. However, I heavily doubt the realistic version being in Jurassic World. According to Henry Wu "Nothing is natural here at Jurassic World; we have always filled in gaps of the dinosaurs with other animals. In fact, if their DNA was 100% real, many of them would look quite different." This means that many of the classic creatures kept their JP traits, and Spinosaurus would be one of 'em, so it's highly unlikely, if not impossible, for a realistic version of the Spinosaurus to be in Jurassic World.