Board Thread:Movie discussion/@comment-27339339-20160421194220/@comment-28675190-20160912132522

Old Memes &amp; Sweet Dreams wrote:

Jakeoraptor wrote: I thought it was a decent sequel, the Spinosaurus was awesome, the action sequences were pretty good and Sam Neil as Alan Grant was great but some of the characters were unlikeable and the some of the dinosaurs looked weird also the story wasn't great but other than that I thought it was pretty good, what are your thoughts

It was just an ok sequel. To me it felt like a bit of a letdown as compared to the first and second films.

The characters weren't that likeable. (Eric, Amanda, Paul, Udesky, Billy), and the dinosaurs weren't as realistic in most scenes.

I also didn't care for the soundtrack. It felt lacking. I personally was disapointed. The Spinosaurus was cool but I feel it should have been used differently. I would redo the T.rexs role since it was there to be killed off. I would rather have it match up with the spino then be scared away. They could have used for land scenes and have them be a threat to the people for say 15 minutes then let the spino take over after having them roar and snao at each other for say 5 minutes and have them fight for some time and have the Rex back down. Also having A PLANE ram into its sail? Thats gotta hur but nope its fine. Less sexism would be good. All amnda kirby does is scream, be an idiot and nothing else. Do the guys scream once? NOPE.

My issues

Blatant sexism and stereotypes

inaccuracies

too short

T.rex's role

Overatting the raptor but having them play a small role.

Those are my issues. It is easily the weakest of the franchise.