Board Thread:Battle Arena/@comment-99.45.72.19-20170519212237/@comment-2118191-20170918161929

107.72.162.108 wrote: CrashBash wrote: I don't really understand the logic behind some of these. Why would Diprotodon even have the same animations as Doedicurus in the first place? Also, it doesn't feel right that Hyaenodon has the same animations as Smilodon and not the more dog-like carnivores, since it more closely resembles one.

I have to assume some of these are simply typos. That is simply stupid to make Diprotodon have Doedicurus Animation, or to make Hyaenodon have the Smilodon animation. Diprotodon should have the Sarkastodon animation, and Hyaenodon should be either independent or have Andrewsarchus animation (either savannah or cave). Also, isn't Pachycephalosaurus already used for Pachyceratops, then why is the bone-headed dinosaur being combined with Scaphognathus? Ludia is being stupid and TOO inaccurate with its creatures.

Isn't that being a whisker too hypocritical? Because if Diprotodon shared the Sarkastodon model, it would be eating fish. Isn't that "too inaccurate" too?

Also, it could be Pachyrhinosaurus, y'know. Don't be so judgemental and rude.