Board Thread:Manual of Style/@comment-1259419-20160517104930/@comment-1187034-20160524030209

I like what you've written so far on this issue, BastionMonk, though I do have some suggestions.

I think that JP: TG should have its own section. It has a good amount of supplementary material and a very long storyline which depending on the article might take up 2/3 of the "Games" section.

As for assumptions, like assuming that the "Dodgson" mentioned in JP1 was Dr. Lewis Dodgson of BioSyn, I'm totally okay with. However, I think we should write something like "It is presumed that Dodgson shared the same forename and worked for BioSyn like his novel counterpart, but this never mentioned in the films nor any known currently released supplementary material." This is because a new movie or supplementary material could come out at any time revealing his first name to be anything but "Lewis" and that the film Dodgson wasn't affiliated with BioSyn at all.

As for the system you brought up in the section "No dogma's, give sources," I think it would easier if a template was created that gives text that contains information from information not found in the film itself a different color from the rest of the text written in an article. I believe this would tell readers that this information does not come any of the films themselves and might not be true or could be contradicted with the release of another film.