Board Thread:Jurassic Park News/@comment-45.73.154.146-20171026180511/@comment-107.72.162.51-20171027195453

Edaphosaurus wrote: Also, the use of debunked in this thread is too damn high.

The Mononykus and Baby Apatosaurus (which btw look completely different) have yet to be debunked. If we want to debunk them we need either: a) the finished movie or b) their original sources. Someone saying they aren’t legit is not a debunk unless they have good evidence. In this case little evidence is needed to debunk them

On that note, no I do not take the Reddit post as truth. Like the Mononykus, how do we know that comes from the correct source? Without strong evidence we do not know the truth either way.

A note on the Concavenator - the fact that it doesn’t 100% look like a Concavenator does not debunk that possibility, because this is Jurassic park and all the dinosaurs look like shit. Additionally, if you google Concavenator you can find many an image with the duo sail configuration in the image. Meanwhile, the Ichthyovenator’s sail notch? Fossil damage I’m afraid, the animal probably didn’t have it in life.

As for maintainance of continuity, have you not seen Jurassic World? They care little for any of the original designs, looking like a child’s drawing of a JP dinosaur. Likewise, the filmmakers do not care for the novels, websites, leaflets and other such things you use to suggest that animals like Baryonyx are totally in this one you guys! Brachiosaurus? Gallimimus? Mamenchisaurus? Corythosaurus? Spinosaurus? Ceratosaurus? Pteranodon? Dimorphodon? Completely non-existent in the novels. Even Compsognathus pisses on the Procompsognathus of the novels, waving its erroneous species name behind it. Remember all those novel dinosaurs and leaflet dinosaurs that were going to be in Jurassic World? Remember how many of them were actually IN Jurassic World? 1. Apatosaurus 1st Paragraph:. Yeah, you are right in the fact that Mononykus and Baby Apatosaurus (already confirmed, according to your last post) could still have a chance to appear in JW:FK. If you really find something that NEEDS to be debunked, then you need to present good evidence for it.

2nd Paragraph: This paragraph is what I can connect with you 4th Paragraph. Again, I HAVE told you about this before. Carnotaurus has appeared in The Lost World novel, so if it's to appear in JW:FK, that makes 2 novel dinosaurs to appear in the JW Trilogy, along with Apatosaurus. Baryonyx has had its name seen in the Cold Storage Room, and appeared in the JP Brochure. Oh, and that leak said "It will be a more drab and grey color, with a little more turquoise." Thus likely hinting that this is the JP Counterpart Baryonyx. Oh, and one more thing; JW:FK has confirmed that it will stay very close to the novels, so this paragraph could be easily 'debunked'. AND I have not forgotten that if you went to Reddit and posted that you have seen behind-the-scenes evidence of Acrocanthosaurus and Chilesaurus (and Stygimoloch, although this dinosaur is indefinitely confirmed), your post would be questioned, since Acro and Chile shared some rare history in the JP Movies and Novels, compared to Carnotaurus and Baryonyx.

3rd Paragraph: Yes, Concavenator has the double sail, and yes, all the dinos in the JP Franchise look like sh*t. But if you seriously believe that Ichthyovenator had its spine damaged in life, then where's the evidence? See, if you don't have any evidence that Ichthyovenator had a misunderstanding with its sail with you bloating about 'you need evidence to prove or debunk this', then I'm afraid that you contradicted yourself.

4th Paragraph: If the filmmakers did not care for the novels, then what would we have for the JP Movie Series? What, Spinosaurus fighting T.Rex making Fanboy wars and dinosaur fights and illogically inaccurate dinosaurs? Jurassic Park was about man over nature and power, and the movie series is following that just fine. No it doesn't matter what dinosaurs you put in the films, because ANY dinosaur can appear in the JP Franchise (yes even Stygimoloch). Hell, even just one JP Film can have both Compsognathus AND Procompsognathus in the same film, like having Velociraptor with Deinonychus and Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus and Mosasaurus and Tylosaurus and Brachiosaurus and Mamenchisaurus and Pachycephalosaurus and Stygimoloch and Ceratosaurus and Carnotaurus and Baryonyx and Suchomimus, and the list goes on. Yes, the TLW and JP3 dinosaurs weren't in the novel, but how does that help with anything?

Geez, this is a pretty long essay. Let's just wait for what will happen in JW:FK. Let's get back to discussing these revealed Lego sets.