Thread:CrashBash/@comment-1633483-20171214212225/@comment-1633483-20171219021300

Hi CrashBash, I realise that your time has probably been sapped dealing with sockpuppets and edit wars, but I've uploaded my rewrite of the Tyrannosaurus rex page. UltraMegaDude undid the first edit, but has since restored it once we discussed his issues in some depth. Additionally, I transferred the information from the novel canon to a separate page and updated the spoiler and change templates. I have experience with infoboxes, navboxes and other templates too, if you'd like me to take a look at updating them too.

Out of curiousity, is it actually wiki policy to lead into dinosaur articles with paleontological information, rather than franchise lore? I've noticed that a large number of dinosaur pages consist almost entirely of real-world paleontology, which is all well and good, but that information is often lifted from Wikipedia, such as the Kosmoceratops page. I feel as though an introduction with a heavier focus on canon, as well as some real-life information would be a good middle-ground. Additionally, a separate "Paleontology" section on each relevant page, as well as a heavier emphasis on Jurassic Park lore, similar to Jurassic Pedia would go a long way to streamline articles.