It's been known that Articles 11 & 13 was reject, and now they Reprise again. Article 11 & 13 is sections of the directive will completely reconfigure websites’ responsibilities when it comes to enforcing copyrights. Until the given online platforms broad protection from being subject to copyright penalties they simply would acted as a conduit for user uploads. It’s very similar to the laws in the U.S. that exempt YouTube from penalties as long as its making its best effort to take down infringing material when it’s reported. YouTube uses an automated content recognition system combined with an army of human beings to review the material users’ upload. It costs the company millions of dollars to do this.
They'd be powered by bots that basically would have errors and just copyright majority of things, they don't have protection. And this could mean we may not have our Freedom of the Internet if we don't stand our ground!
I have removed all the dinosaur pages you created that simply had listed "It's from JP Institute". Please don't do something like that again, they really don't help anyone in the long run. There is a way pages like those are supposed to be filled out.
Interesting fact about the Cerato you posted, but would it be possible for you to get a screen cap of the commentary with subtitles on the part where it's stated that the Ceratosaurus was a modified T. rex model? I'd like a more proper source.
I downloaded the app, but I can't find the size chart. I think it's fanmade because the app only has Velociraptor, Apatosaurus, and Indominus rex while the size chart has Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and Stegosaurus and doesn't have Pteranodon nor Apatosaurus.
1. The image of Carnotaurus is fan art.
2. Please do not plagiarise articles from Jurassic Park Legacy. This article is an obvious copy paste of this one. I do not want to see you stealing any articles from them again. You have been warned.