FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I added some tabs above the articles of Owen Grady, Claire Dearing, Maisie Lockwood, Simon Masrani and Dennis Nedry to allow to make editing easier so users can edit certain sections of it since they couldn't with those tabbers on it.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, I'm here to tell that Disneysaurus needs to be part of Jurassic Park wiki. He told me that the full Pixar film is from Disney and Jurassic Park is universal and I believe him.

    Just because the user's name is called Disneysaurus doesn't mean he works for Disney. That's discrimination.

    Logo8th since you are easy to trust. Can you help unblock Disneysaurus please?

      Loading editor
    • View all 18 replies
    • Dinosaurus1 wrote: Taking in the information the others said while I was gone, maybe we need to think about this more. Of course, there is the possibility that Disneysaurus didn’t learn his mistake after all, but we could talk to him on the DPG Wikia.

      You do have a good point. Deal with him on the DPG Wiki. If he doesn't learn from his mistakes, he will banned on this wiki for good.

        Loading editor
    • Calm down everyone.

      All Disneysaurus did is adjust the render on Gryposaurus. That's all he did which doesn't count as bad.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Thank you for seeing to this user - however, this is the third time he's been banned from the wiki for the exact same thing. First time he was banned one year by BastionMonk, the second time he was banned two years by me. Two weeks seems a bit short.

      Loading editor
    • I was unaware that he'd been banned before. I can increase the length of his ban if need be.

        Loading editor
    • Well, one year did nothing, two years did nothing, he's clearly not going to learn, so it should probably be at least three years, or even indefinite.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm still wondering that Nanotyrannus lancensis is still its own species rather than juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex because of the dueling dinosaur fossil and the Cleveland skull discovered during World War II.

    The Dueling Dinosaurs sculpture
    Dueling Dinosaurs fossil displayed in New York
    Blood Mary's fossil arm
    Bloody Mary fossil
    Bloody Mary's fossil rib bones
    Bloody Mary's fossil upper jaw
      Loading editor
    • Until someone actually gets to study and publish papers on the Dueling Dinosaurs, we don't really know for sure if they prove Nanotyrannus' validity or not.

        Loading editor
    • Ok then but I also know that the brain case of the Cleveland skull and made the brain model of it turns out the brain doesn't match with T-rex's brain.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello there, I realized you seem very understandable and I was wondering is it true the Triceratops clones are different to the original according to the study of young fossil individuals and website Jurassic Pedia talking about as well?

    Triceratops growth stages in the museum
    Triceratops epoccipitals




    Why is the Tyrannosaurus rex article split to T/film and T/novel rather than being just one?

      Loading editor
    • For one, there are two different universes of JP franchise. Novel and Film.

        Loading editor
    • Okay???

      But I was expecting Logo8th to answer my question.

        Loading editor
    • I'm not sure I fully understnad your question. Are you asking if the baby Triceratops seen in the films are different from their real life counterparts?

        Loading editor
    • Well I was talking about the adult Triceratops clones when I saw them have triangular epoccipitals on their frills in the movie while the original doesn't have any but the epoccipitals can only be found on younger individuals.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • 4F96458F-5FDF-4086-BD2C-A8498D47445C
      Loading editor
    • Did I suggest this hybrid before, when Aquatic and Glacier hybrids were introduced?

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello! I'm Sannse, from Fandom's Editor Experience team. I'm contacting you as the most recently active admin. Hopefully you can pass this on to others as needed.

    One project that we're excited about launching is an initiative to pair newly registered users with experienced advisors (which they can choose from). These advisors would be available for answering basic editing questions and guiding appropriate edits, in the hope that these users will become active in the local community.

    Why do this, rather than rely on admins and moderators? We've seen from research and experience (both from Wikipedia) that establishing a human bond with a peer "senpai" or mentor can have a better effect on the comfort of the newcomer, especially where the high volume of edits may cause the quick response of rollbacks rather than taking the time to walk new editors through their early work. While some communities do take that time and care among their leaders, we feel an additional level might put new users at ease and help them be more comfortable with editing. Ultimately, we feel like this project will either free up some time for admins and moderators, or designate them as approachable welcomers to talk to and guide new users. We want to see how effective this is on a relatively small number of communities and see if Fandom's results are consistent with those experienced on Wikipedia. If they are, we may pursue expanding the pilot program and perhaps seeking to build it into a core part of the new platform.

    Here's what we would wish for your community to agree to:

    • At least one volunteer advisor, acting as an advisor and advocate helping newcomers. For the most part, this means responding to questions that newcomers leave the advisor in Discussions. Sometimes this may mean the advisor interacts with admins and moderators to address concerns regarding the newcomer. We have some advisors-at-large (those not tied to the local community, but available as fallbacks) already, but if you have ideas on who you might want to represent you in this role (or if you'd like to do so yourself!), feel free to contact me on my Wall.
    • Discussions / Feeds. Your community must have this active for the current solution to work. This is the primary method in which advisors have open communication with the users that choose them. We also recommend a Feeds channel of “Help Desk” where the communications can be placed, if you do not have a similar channel.
    • A change to your Welcome Messages to allow a method where a newcomer can choose an advisor. If you are currently participating in the MyDashboard program, there will be a card there to interact with an advisor.
      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Namely the Dinosaur hybrid category from Archaeophicyon due to neither disable animals being dinosaurs and the JW: The Game and JB: Builder dinosaurs categories from Mesonyx, Subhyracodon, Temnodontosaurus, and Aceratherium due to them only being mentioned and not being part of the games, like how we don't add Archaeornithomimus in the category of Animals in the films due to it only being mentioned.

      Loading editor
    • Will do. I wasn't sure if I should add those categories, but I did to show where they were mentioned and to confirm that they have a place in the franchise. If that's against policy, I'll remove said categories.

        Loading editor
    • Done.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I forgot about the Dimorphodon being there and me deleting it despite it being not confirmed. My bad.

      Loading editor
    Animalman57
    Animalman57 closed this thread because:
    This has diverged off what this walk was meant to be.
    23:06, November 14, 2019
    • View all 5 replies
    • I never said that. You just dont understand what variant means.

        Loading editor
    • "Actually, there have been 6 variations of raptors in the film series. An argument could even be made for 7."

      This is what you stated earlier. Okay, I'll give you the fact since 7 might seem like a stretch, but "variant" doesn't mean that two individuals, each with even the most minorly different details, are separate variants. Like I said, sometimes the males and females in species of animal can have different patterning.

        Loading editor
  • Smilonemys is a hybrid of Smilocephalosaurus and Carbonemys, not Smilodon and Carbonemys. I corrected it for you.

      Loading editor
    • My mistake, conidering that I don't have any of those components myself. Thanks for your help.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.